Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Volume 22 Issue 3
Jun 2011
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Shigui Du, Yunjin Hu, Xiaofei Hu, Xiao Guo. Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength. Journal of Earth Science, 2011, 22(3): 411-420. doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6
Citation: Shigui Du, Yunjin Hu, Xiaofei Hu, Xiao Guo. Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength. Journal of Earth Science, 2011, 22(3): 411-420. doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6

Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength

doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6
Funds:

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 40672186

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 50809059

the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China Y505008

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Yunjin Hu, huyunjin@tsinghua.org.cn
  • Received Date: 13 Oct 2009
  • Accepted Date: 19 Mar 2010
  • Publish Date: 01 Jun 2011
  • In order to study the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC (joint roughness coefficient)-JCS (joint compressive strength) model, natural rock joints of different lithologic characteristics and different sizes were selected as samples, and their shear strengths under dry and saturated conditions were measured by direct shear test and compared to those estimated by the JRC-JCS model. Comparison results show that for natural rock joints with joint surfaces closely matched, the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 9.9%; the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is good under both dry and saturated conditions if the JRC is determined accounting for directional statistical measurements, scale effect and surface smoothing during shearing. However, for natural rock joints with joint surfaces mismatched, the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 39.9%; the reliability of empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is questionable under both dry and saturated conditions.

     

  • loading
  • Amadei, B., Wibowo, J., Sture, S., et al., 1998. Applicability of Existing Models to Predict the Behavior of Replicas of Natural Fractures of Welded Tuff under Different Boundary Conditions. Geotech. Geo. Eng. , 16(2): 79–128 doi: 10.1023/A:1008886106337
    Bandis, S., Lumsden, A. C., Barton, N. R., 1981. Experimental Studies of Scale Effects on the Shear Behavior of Rock Joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. , 18(1): 1–21
    Barton, N., 1973. Review of a New Shear Strength Criterion for Rock Joints. Eng. Geol. , 7(4): 287–332 doi: 10.1016/0013-7952(73)90013-6
    Barton, N., Bandis, S., 1990. Review of Predictive Capabilities of JRC-JCS Model in Engineering Practice. In: Barton, N., Stephansson, O., eds., Rock Joints. Balkema, Rotterdam. 603–610
    Barton, N., Choubey, V., 1977. The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice. Rock Mech. Suppl. , 10(1–2): 1–54
    Du, S. G., Hu, Y. J., Hu, X. F., 2009. Measurement of Joint Roughness Coefficient by Using Profilograph and Roughness Ruler. Journal of Earth Science, 20(5): 890–896 doi: 10.1007/s12583-009-0075-3
    Fardin, N., Stephansson, O., Jing, L. R., 2001. The Scale Dependence of Rock Joint Surface Roughness. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. , 38(5): 659–669 doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00028-4
    Geertsema, A. J., 2002. The Shear Strength of Planar Joints in Mudstone. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. , 39(8): 1045–1049 doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00100-4
    Grasselli, G., Egger, P., 2003. Constitutive Law for the Shear Strength of Rock Joints Based on Three-Dimensional Surface Parameters. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. , 40(1): 25–40 doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00101-6
    Homand, F., Belem, T., Souley, M., 2001. Friction and Degradation of Rock Joint Surfaces under Shear Loads. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mech. Geomech. , 25(10): 973–999 doi: 10.1002/nag.163
    Jiang, Y. J., Li, B., Tanabashi, Y., 2006. Estimating the Relation between Surface Roughness and Mechanical Properties of Rock Joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. , 43(6): 837–846 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.11.013
    Kwon, T. H., Baak, S. H., Cho, G. C., 2004. Shear Behaviour of Idealized Rock Joints: Microscale Analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 19(4–5): 535
    Lee, S. W., Hong, E. S., Bae, S. I., et al., 2006. Modelling of Rock Joint Shear Strength Using Surface Roughness Parameter, Rs. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 21(3–4): 239
    Unal, M., Unver, B., 2004. Characterization of Rock Joint Surface Degradation under Shear Loads. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. , 41(3): 380–381 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.12.042
    Wang, J. G., Ichikawa, Y., Leung, C. F., 2003. A Constitutive Model for Rock Interfaces and Joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. , 40(1): 41–53 doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00113-2
    Wines, D. R., Lilly, P. A., 2003. Estimates of Rock Joint Shear Strength in Part of the Fimiston Open Pit Operation in Western Australia. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. , 40(6): 929–937 doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00020-0
    Zhao, J., 1997. Joint Surface Matching and Shear Strength, Part B: JRC-JMC Shear Strength Criterion. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. , 34(2): 179–185 doi: 10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00063-0
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(552) PDF downloads(36) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return