Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Wei Du, Zaixing Jiang, Ying Zhang, Jie Xu. Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Facies in the Lower Member of the Permian Shanxi Formation, Northeastern Ordos Basin, China. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(1): 75-88. doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0308-3
Citation: Wei Du, Zaixing Jiang, Ying Zhang, Jie Xu. Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Facies in the Lower Member of the Permian Shanxi Formation, Northeastern Ordos Basin, China. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(1): 75-88. doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0308-3

Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Facies in the Lower Member of the Permian Shanxi Formation, Northeastern Ordos Basin, China

doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0308-3
Funds:

the China National Key Research Project 2011ZX05009-002

the MOE Yangtze River Scholar and Innovative Team Program of China IRT0864

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Wei Du: duweiamy@163.com
  • Received Date: 10 Feb 2012
  • Accepted Date: 25 Apr 2012
  • Publish Date: 01 Feb 2013
  • The Lower Permian Shanxi (山西) Formation is one of the main gas-bearing stratigraphic units in northeastern Ordos (鄂尔多斯) Basin, China. Based on an integrated investigation of well logs, cores, and outcrop, we delineated the sedimentary facies of the lower member of the Shanxi Formation and divided the succession into three third-order sequences from base to top as SQ1, SQ2, and SQ3. The lower region of Shanxi Formation was deposited in the following sedimentary facies or subfacies: subaqueous braided channel, subaqueous interdistributary, mouth bar, swamp and shelf in the Daniudi (大牛地) Gas Field and braided channel, and shelf and lake at Heidaigou (黑岱沟) outcrop. Braided-river deposits form the lowstand systems tract (LST) in each sequence. Braided channels mark the sequence boundaries at Heidaigou outcrop. A shelf and lake depositional environment with dark gray mudstone forms the transgressive systems tract (TST). The location where dark gray mudstone first appears above the braided channel marks the first flooding surface (FFS), and the end of that marks the maximum flooding surface (MFS). The highstand systems tract (HST) deposits are fine-grained sediments with an aggradational parasequence at Heidaigou outcrop and swamp coalbed in the Daniudi Gas Field. Mouth-bar sand bodies in braided delta front, which form the LST in each sequence, form excellent reservoirs in the Daniudi Gas Field.

     

  • There are various viewpoints about the sequence subdivision and sedimentary facies in the lower member of the Permian Shanxi Formation, northeastern Ordos Basin, China. Many scholars described the sedimentary facies by the cores in the subsurface and others using the outcrops in the northeastern Ordos Basin. The sequence subdivision and the sedimentary facies have not been connected by the cores and the outcrop until now. Different views cause a large amount of difficulties in prediction and exploration. This paper uses the outcrop and the cores from the subsurface to build a new model of the sequence subdivision and the sedimentary facies in the northeastern Ordos Basin.

    In China, the Ordos Basin is the second largest sedimentary basin that contains huge proven geologic reserves of natural gas. With an area of approximately 320 000 km2, the basin is located in the western part of the North China Block. The Ordos Basin comprises six structural units: Yimeng uplift, Western edge overthrust belt, Tianhuan depression, Yishan ramp, Jinxi flexural belt, and Weibei uplift (Hao et al., 2007; Cao, 2005; Chang et al., 2004; Li and Lu, 2002). The focus of this paper is the Daniudi Gas Field, which is located in northeastern Yishan ramp and has an area of approximately 2 003 km2 (Fig. 1).

    Figure  1.  (a) Structural divisions of the Ordos Basin (modified from Qiu and Gong, 1999); (b) geologic structure cross section of the Ordos Basin (modified from Li and Lu, 2002); (c) well locations and cross-well profiles shown in Fig. 6a and seismic profiles shown in Fig. 6b of the Daniudi Gas Field.

    The Lower Permian Shanxi Formation, which lasted approximately 9 Ma, was deposited in a very gentle paleo-topographic setting (high in the north and low-lying in the south) after an overall regressive succession of the Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation (Chen et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2002; Wang and Shen, 2000). The Shanxi Formation is an important gas-bearing stratigraphic unit, particularly the formation's lower member, which forms one of the most important gas plays in the Daniudi Gas Field (Hao et al., 2006).

    The thickness of the lower member of Shanxi Formation varies from 70 to 90 m, and the formation consists of three submembers, P1s1-1, P1s1-2, and P1s1-3 (Fig. 2). The first submember, P1s1-1, consists of medium- to coarse-grained sandstone, thick coalbeds and mudstone, whereas P1s1-2 and P1s1-3 consist mainly of conglomerate and gravelly sandstones as well as coarse-grained sandstones, thin coalbeds, and mud-stones. During the Late Paleozoic, siliciclastic sediments were derived mainly from the Yimeng uplift in the northern Ordos Basin (Dou et al., 2009).

    Figure  2.  Lithology, sedimentary facies, and sequence stratigraphic divisions of the lower member of Shanxi Formation in the Daniudi Gas Field. The lower member of Shanxi Formation can be divided into three third-order sequences: SQ1, SQ2, and SQ3; LST. lowstand systems tract; TST. transgressive systems tract; HST. highstand systems tract.

    Differing views exist concerning the sedimentary models of the study area. He et al. (2001) suggested that the clastic sedimentary system must have been caused by the meandering river's shallow marine delta. Ye and Qi (2008) proposed that the delta was deposited on a shallow sea. Zhu et al. (2007) described a wetlands-valley model with strong erosion in the study area. Other researchers have proposed that the sedimentary system in the study area is a deltaicfluvial system. Zhang et al. (2011) suggested that the Lower Shanxi Formation was deposited in an epicontinental environment as is evidenced by marine fossils.

    For the study area, many different sequence subdivision schemes have been proposed by different researchers (Zhu et al., 2002; Fan et al., 1999; Zhai and Deng, 1999). Zhang et al. (1997) interpreted the Shanxi Formation as a single third-order sequence and proposed a sequence stratigraphic model with the lowstand systems tracts (LST) consisting mainly of braided-channel sandstones, the transgressive systems tracts (TST) dominated by anastomosing deposits, and the highstand systems tract comprising meandering river deposits. However, this interpretation is too broad to be useful in delineating the detailed sedimentary features observed or to adequately explain the lateral distribution of reservoir sand bodies in the study area. Li et al. (2003) interpreted the lower member of the Shanxi Formation as a single third-order sequence. Zhu et al. (2007) interpreted the lower member of the Shanxi Formation as three third-order sequences that are characterized by a strong basinward regression.

    This work was conducted using cores from 20 wells, 2 000 km2 of 3D seismic data and well-log and gas-production data from 100 wells. Detailed cores and precise measurement of a well-exposed outcrop at Heidaigou allowed us to identify sedimentary microfacies within the three submembers of the lower member of Shanxi Formation. Samples were analyzed by ICP-AES to determine the trace elements in the mudstone. As a result, a new sequence stratigraphic framework was established, and facies types were identified (Fig. 2).

    The Heidaigou outcrop is located in southern Inner Mongolia, approximately 160 km from the Daniudi Gas Field in northeastern Ordos Basin (Fig. 1a). The outcrop is approximately 70 m thick and can be divided into 8 sections (Fig. 3).

    Figure  3.  Lithology, sedimentary facies, and sequence stratigraphic divisions of the lower member of Shanxi Formation at Heidaigou outcrop (see Fig. 1a for location).

    The lower member of Shanxi Formation at Heidaigou outcrop begins with a scour surface at the base, indicating the erosion on the underlying Taiyuan Formation. The first section of Heidaigou outcrop consists of gravelly coarse-grained sandstones (Fig. 3). These deposits comprise three fining-upward successions. In the first fining-upward succession, 4 m thick gravelly coarse sandstone erodes the mudstone of the Taiyuan Formation (Fig. 4a). The succession begins with massive bedding (Fig. 4a), followed by planar cross-bedding and inclined cross-bedding (Fig. 4b). Two other fining-upward cycles also have scour surfaces at their bases. Trough cross-beddings are the major sedimentary structures. These characteristics indicate braided-channel deposits.

    Figure  4.  Photographs of the sedimentary structures of the lower member of Shanxi Formation at Heidaigou outcrop (see Fig. 1a for location). (a) Sandstones erode the underlying mudstone; (b) incline bedding; (c) dark gray mudstone in P1s1-1; (d) parallel bedding; (e) sandstones erode the underlying mudstone in P1s1-2; (f) planar cross-bedding in P1s1-2; (g) gray black mudstone in P1s1-2; (h) wavy cross-bedding; (i) sandstones erode the underlying mudstone in P1s1-3; (j) wedge-shaped cross-bedding; (k) planar cross-bedding in P1s1-3; (l) conglomerates erode the underlying silty mudstone of P1s1-3.

    The deposits of Section 2 are 8.5 m-thick mudstone (Fig. 3). The color of the mudstone changes from dark gray to black from bottom to top (Fig. 4c). The Sr/Ba is 0.48 in sample 2 with a sharp rise to 1.57 in sample 3 (Table 1). In addition, the Sr/Ca increases from 141.7 to 901.0 in the two samples. All these characteristics show that the sea level rises sharply upward in the mudstone. On the basis of the color of the mudstone and the trace elements in the samples, we suggest that the mudstone is a shelf deposit.

    Table  1.  Trace-element content in mudstone samples at Heidaigou outcrop, see Fig. 3 for location
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Section 3 at Heidaigou outcrop consists of mudstone, silty mudstone, siltstone, and fine sandstone. These fine-grained sediments can be divided into three reverse cycles. Each cycle begins with silty mudstone, followed by siltstone and fine sandstone. The succession in the sandstone begins with parallel bedding, followed by wavy cross-bedding (Fig. 4d). Compared with the samples from the lower part, the Sr/Ba in sample 4 decreased to 0.13. This decrease indicates a sharp fall in the relative sea level. These fine-grained sediments indicate a shoreline deposit.

    The preceding three sections comprise submember P1s1-1 of the lower member of Shanxi Formation at Heidaigou outcrop.

    Section 4 is gravelly coarse sandstone that is deposited in a fining-upward succession that begins with a scour surface at the base (Fig. 3). Gravel diameter in the coarse-grained sandstone is approximately 2 cm (Fig. 4e). Planar cross-bedding is the major sedimentary structure (Fig. 4f). These characteristics indicate a braided river, and the succession may represent braided-channel deposits.

    Above Section 4, a 4.5 m thick layer of mudstone exists whose color changes from gray to dark gray from bottom to top (Fig. 3). The trace elements in these three samples (samples 5–7) show that the sea level rose (Table 1). The Sr/Ba in these three samples indicates that the mudstone is lake deposit.

    Section 6 at Heidaigou outcrop consists of mudstone, silty mudstone, siltstone, and fine sandstone. These fine-grained sediments can be divided into three reverse cycles. Each cycle begins with silty mudstone, followed by siltstone and fine sandstone. The succession in the sandstone begins with parallel bedding, followed by wavy cross-bedding (Fig. 4h). These fine-grained sediments indicate lake deposits with more terrestrial detritus than the fifth part at Heidaigou outcrop.

    Sections 4 to 6 comprise the second submember, P1s1-2, in the lower member of Shanxi Formation at Heidaigou outcrop.

    Section 7 at Heidaigou outcrop is composed of gravelly coarse sandstone and conglomerate that are deposited in a fining-upward succession (Fig. 4i). The gravel diameter in the gravelly coarse sandstone is approximately 5 cm, and the gravels are directionally arranged (Fig. 4j). The succession has large trough cross-bedding (Fig. 4k). These characteristics represent terrestrial braided-channel deposits.

    The uppermost section of the deposits at Heidaigou outcrop is gray silty sandstone.

    Based on the sedimentary characteristics of the eight parts of the deposits from P1s1-1 to P1s1-3 at Heidaigou outcrop, we suggest that three braided-river depositional systems exist, a shelf depositional system and three lake depositional systems (Fig. 3). We recognize the first, fourth, and seventh parts of the deposits as a braided-river facies. These three parts of sandstone are braided channel with fine-upward successions.

    A braided-stream depositional system exists in the lowermost part of submember P1s1-1 at Heidaigou outcrop. The erosion on the underlying Taiyuan Formation indicates a sequence boundary of SQ1 (Fig. 4a). The 18 m thick braided-channel sandstone is interpreted as having developed during a relative fall in sea level and represents the lowstand systems tract (LST) of SQ1.

    The braided-channel sandstone is covered by gray mudstone, which forms the bottom layer of the second part of Heidaigou outcrop. The deposits of the second part are mainly mudstone and silty mudstone whose color changes from gray to black from base to top. These characteristics indicate that the sea level underwent a sharp rise, and the input of terrigenous sediments decreased, which can also be proved by the Sr/Ba and Sr/Ca in the mudstone samples. We propose that the gray mudstone at the beginning of the second part marks the first flooding surface (FFS), and the black mudstone at the end of second part marks the maximum flooding surface (MFS). Therefore, the second part of Heidaigou outcrop is attributed to the transgressive systems tract (TST) in SQ2.

    The uppermost deposits of P1s1-1 at Heidaigou outcrop consist of mudstone, silty mudstone, siltstone, and fine sandstone, which can be divided into three reverse cycles. These fine-grained sediments suggest a greater rate of sediment supply than during the deposition of the underlying mudstone. We infer that the sea level had begun to fall and that this part of P1s1-1 represents the highstand systems tract deposition in SQ1 (Chen et al., 2001).

    The fourth part of the deposits at Heidaigou outcrop is a braided-river depositional system, which erodes the HST in SQ1 (Fig. 4e). The erosion forms a sequence boundary in SQ2. The entire fourth part is considered the lowstand systems tract of SQ2.

    On the basis of the changes in mudstone color from gray to dark gray from base to top and the testing of samples from above the LST in SQ2, we infer that the sea level rose and the fifth part of Heidaigou outcrop represents the TST in SQ2. The uppermost deposits of P1s1-2 constitute several reverse cycles. These progradational deposited cycles indicate that the sea level began to fall and that this part of P1s1-2 represents the HST deposition in SQ2.

    The seventh part of the Heidaigou outcrop deposits is typical of the braided channel that formed the lowstand systems tract of SQ3. The uppermost deposits of the Heidaigou outcrop are 2 m thick gray silty sandstone, which is eroded by the overlying conglomerate in the upper member of Shanxi Formation (Fig. 4l). We suggest the uppermost part as the TST in SQ3 and that the HST of the SQ3 was eroded by the upper strata.

    We chose well D15 as a key well at which to perform facies analysis. Deposits in P1s1-1 are mainly sandstone, mudstone, and coalbed (Fig. 5a). The sandstone, which ranges from 2 840 to 2 857.5 m, can be divided into three parts. The lower part, ranging from 2 853.7 to 2 857.5 m, is coarse- and medium-grained sandstone and displays a coarsening-upward succession. The succession begins with low-angle cross-bedding, followed by "S" foreset laminae (Figs. 5b and 5c). This part of the sandstone is considered a mouth-bar deposit in braided delta front.

    Figure  5.  Detailed descriptions of lithology and sedimentary structures within the lower member of Shanxi Formation from cores (well D15, from 2 780 to 2 858 m). (a) Lithologic log; (b) low-angle cross-bedding; (c) "S" foreset laminae; (d) fining-upward succession; (e) mudstone in P1s1-1; (f) coalbed in P1s1-1; (g) scouring surface and coarse-grained sandstone eroding the underlying mudstone in P1s1-1; (h) scouring surface in P1s1-2; (i) massive bedding; (j) mudstone in P1s1-2; (k) mudstone in P1s1-3. Locations are shown to the left of each photo.

    The middle of the coarse-grained sandstone forms a fining-upward succession that begins with massive beddings and is followed by a trough cross-bedding. The grains are subangular and moderately sorted. The uppermost coarse-grained sandstone is separated from the middle section by approximately 0.5 m thick dark gray silty mudstone (Fig. 5g), and the main succession is massive bedding (Fig. 5h). The GR log of the upper part of the coarse-grained sandstone is typically cylinder-shaped (2 840.5–2 849.5 m, D15, Fig. 5). The characteristics of these two fining-upward parts of sandstone indicate a subaqueous braided-channel facies.

    The mudstone overlying the sandstone, ranging from 2 835.5 to 2 840.5 m, contains a small amount of carbonaceous clastics and plant stems (Fig. 5e). Some crinoids and foraminifera debris are found in the dark gray mudstone (Zhang et al., 2011). These characteristics indicate that the mudstone was deposited in a marine environment. The sea level rose, and the mudstone was created as the result of a shelf deposit.

    The uppermost deposits in P1s1-1, which range from 2 823.5 to 2 835.5 m, comprise three sets of thick coalbeds and two sets of thin black carbonaceous mudstones (Fig. 5f). These deposits formed in a stable swamp environment.

    The deposits in P1s1-2 range from 2 800 to 2 823.5 m and can be divided into three parts (Fig. 5a). The lower part is sandstone with a fining-upward succession ranging from 2 823.5 to 2 815 m. This sandstone erodes the carbonaceous mudstone of P1s1-1 (Fig. 5h). The main features of the sandstone are the massive gravelly coarse sandstones, which are poorly sorted but whose roundness is high. The particle size of the gravels ranges from 2 to 3 mm. The gravelly sandstone has little matrix and is particle-supported, indicating a subaqueous braided-channel deposit.

    The middle part of P1s1-2 is mudstone and ranges from 2 803 to 2 815 m. The lithology is mostly grayish green, gray, and chromocratic mudstone with little silty mudstone (Fig. 5j). On the basis of an electron probe analysis of the mudstone sample, Zhang et al. (2011) determined that the content of the Mg/O in the siderite of the mudstone sample is approximately 0.5%–7.8%, which indicates a shelf depositional environment.

    The uppermost part of P1s1-2, ranging from 2 800 to 2 803 m, comprises coalbeds and thin black carbonaceous mudstones (Fig. 5a). Different from P1s1-1, the thickness of the coalbed in the upper part of P1s1-2 is 3 m, and it decreases sharply. These deposits indicate a swamp depositional environment.

    The deposits in P1s1-3 range from 2 779.5 to 2 800.5 m and are mainly conglomerate, sandstone, mudstone and coalbed (Fig. 5a). These deposits can be divided into four parts. The first three parts form a coarsening-upward succession followed by a finingupward succession. The fourth part of the sandstone forms a fining-upward succession.

    The first part of coarsening-upward succession, which ranges from 2 796.5 to 2 800.5 m, is coarse-grained sandstone with mudstone rips (Fig. 5a). The grains are subangular and moderately sorted. The upper sandstone, which ranges from 2 793.5 to 2 796.5 m, comprises of gravelly coarse sandstone and conglomerate with a fining-upward succession.

    The succession of the second part of the sandstone is the same as that of the first part, forming a coarsening-upward succession, followed by a finingupward succession that ranges from 2 788.5 to 2 792.5 m (Fig. 5d). The fining-upward succession ranges from 2 788.5 to 2 790.5 m with 5 cm thick gravelly strips supported by particles and overlain by 2 m of conglomerate with massive bedding (Fig. 5i).

    The third part was also deposited in a finingupward succession, which ranges from 2 784.5 to 2 787.5 m. The fourth part of the deposit is a fining upward succession that ranges from 2 782.5 to 2 783.5 m. The channel-floor conglomerate has little matrix and is particle supported.

    The middle section of P1s1-3, from 2 780.5 to 2 782.5 m, is mudstone with carbonaceous clasts (Fig. 5k). Some crinoids and foraminifera debris are found in the mudstone, however, less than in P1s1-1. These characteristics indicate that the mudstone was deposited in a marine environment.

    The uppermost section of P1s1-3, from 2 779.5 to 2 800.5 m, is 1 m thick coalbed, which indicates a swamp depositional environment.

    All the deposits with coarsening-upward successions indicate mouth-bar deposits, and the finingupward successions indicate subaqueous braidedchannel deposit. In addition, the carbonaceous mudstone and coalbed formed in a swamp.

    On the basis of our observations of cores and the examination of well-log response data, we suggest that the lower member of Shanxi Formation was deposited in the following sedimentary facies or subfacies: subaqueous braided channel, subaqueous interdistributary, mouth bar, swamps, and shelf.

    Braided delta is delta with megaclast and controlled by a braided-river system rich in sand and gravel (Jiang, 2003). A mouth bar was mainly deposited at the end of the subaqueous braided channel. Subaqueous braided channels represent the most active part of the distributive channel network and are intimately associated with mouth bars (Cornel and Janokp, 2006). In the study area, the mouth bar contains fine-, medium-, and coarse-grained sandstone. Sandstone is found in the mouth-bar deposits in a coarsening-upward succession with cross-beddings and "S" foreset laminae (Figs. 5b, 5c, and 5d). The sandstone in the subaqueous braided channels was deposited in a fining-upward succession with massive bedding (Figs. 5g, 5h, and 5i).

    A braided delta-front depositional system formed at the bottom of the lower member of Shanxi Formation in the Daniudi Gas Field. The lower part of the deposits in P1s1-1 is coarse-grained sandstone that forms a coarsening-upward succession and overlies the mudstone in Taiyuan Formation (Fig. 5a). The rest of the sandstones in P1s1-1 are mainly subaqueous braided-channel deposits. The mutation of the lithology indicates a sequence boundary of SQ1. Gravelly coarse-grained sandstones are interpreted as having developed during a relative fall in sea level and represent the LST of SQ1 (Van Wagoner et al., 1990).

    The braided delta-front sandstones are overlain by dark gray mudstone in P1s1-1, which contains some crinoids and foraminifera debris. These characteristics indicate that the mudstone was deposited in a marine environment. Compared with the lower part of the braided-delta deposits, the sea level rose in these two parts. The location where dark gray mudstone first appeared is considered the FFS in SQ1. The location where the mudstone disappeared is considered the MFS in SQ1. The entire section of dark gray mudstone forms the TST in SQ1.

    The uppermost deposits in P1s1-1 are coalbed and black carbonaceous mudstones. Coal accumulation is controlled by the tectonic setting, the depositional environment, the paleoclimate, and the availability of plant material (Zhang, 2003; Han and Yang, 1980). Areas in which subsidence rates are either too low or too high are not favorable for coal accumulation (Zhu and Wang, 2010; Shao et al., 2003). Bohacs and Suter (1997) suggested that significant volumes of terrigenous organic matter can be preserved to form coal only when the overall increase in accommodation is approximately equal to the production rate of peat. The sedimentary environment of coal is most likely within the LST and HST when the rates of sea-level change are moderate. The overall increase in accommodation must therefore have approximately equaled the production rate of peat at that time. This aggradational interval represents the HST of SQ1. The entire swamp deposit forms the HST in SQ1.

    A subaqueous braided channel erodes the underlying carbonaceous mudstones of SQ1. The erosion surface is considered the sequence boundary between SQ1 and SQ2. We suggest that the deposit forms the LST of SQ2.

    Above the braided delta-front deposits is 12 m of dark gray mudstone. The content of the Mg/O in the siderite of a sample of the mudstone is approximately 0.5%–7.8%, which indicates a shelf depositional environment (Zhang et al., 2011). The location where dark gray mudstone first appeared is considered the FFS in SQ2. The location where the mudstone disappeared is considered the MFS in SQ2. The entire shelf deposit forms the TST of SQ2.

    At the top of P1s1-2 is a 3.5 m thick layer of coalbed and black carbonaceous mudstones. These swamp deposits are the HST of SQ2.

    The HST of SQ2 is terminated by the overlying braided delta-front sandstone in P1s1-3. The sandstones are mainly conglomerate and coarse-grained sandstone, which deposits as subaqueous braided channel and mouth bar. The braided delta-front sandstone is interpreted as having developed during a relative fall in sea level and represents the LST of SQ3.

    An approximately 2 m thick layer of mudstone overlies the LST in SQ3. The marine depositional environment is also considered the TST in SQ3. Compared with SQ1 and SQ2, the marine depositional environment is much thinner than in SQ1 and SQ2 (Fig. 3).

    The uppermost deposits are 2 m thick coalbed in P1s1-3, which can be considered the HST of SQ3.

    Based on the vertical associations and depositional-cycle characteristics, we divided the lower member of Shanxi Formation into three thirdorder sequences: SQ1, SQ2, and SQ3 in the Daniudi Gas Field. Each sequence consists of three systems tracts: LST, TST, and HST. The LSTs in the three sequences are deposited in a braided delta-front depositional environment, while the TSTs are marine and the HSTs are swamp environment.

    As stated above, three sequences exist in the lower member of Shanxi Formation. The vertical characteristic of the lithology in each sequence is overlapped sandstone, mudstone, and coalbed (Fig. 2). The sandstone occurs mainly in the subaqueous braided channel and mouth bar of a braided delta front in the lower part of each sequence or submember. Dark gray mudstone deposited in a shelf forms the middle part of each submember. The coalbed and carbonaceous mudstones indicate a swamp depositional environment as the uppermost layer of each submember.

    The lateral facies trends shown in Fig. 6 indicate that the subaqueous braided channels in the lower part of each submember in a northeast-southwest direction extend with the sway of the estuary in the braided delta front, which can also be recognized in the seismic profile (Fig. 6b). The sandstone of the mouth bar was deposited at the end of the subaqueous braided channels. The braided delta-front depositional system in P1s1-1 deposits a greater distance from the shoreline than that in P1s1-2 and P1s1-3. As a result, the mouth bars reworked by the waves are more developed in P1s1-1 than in P1s1-2 and P1s1-3.

    Figure  6.  Sedimentary facies stacking patterns and lateral trends (NW-SE). (a) The cross-well profile oriented northeast-southwest is perpendicular to the subaqueous braided channel; (b) seismic-profiles responses; see Fig. 1c for location.

    As shown in Fig. 6a, the width of the subaqueous braided channel in P1s1-1 is only 2–3 km. In P1s1-3, the width reaches 6–8 km. The stacking of the subaqueous braided channels in the three submembers is reflected clearly in the seismic profiles (Fig. 6a). The extension of the subaqueous braided channels in the three submembers forms an obvious progradational shape.

    The progradational shape of the three submembers P1s1-1 to P1s1-3 is also apparent in other ways. On the basis of core observations, we find that the granularity and the size of succession in the sandstone vary regularly from base to top. The sandstone in P1s1-1 is coarse-grained with little gravel, and the successions have cross-beddings and massive beddings. The sediments in P1s1-2 are gravelly with a massive succession. The grain size of the gravel is 2–4 mm (Fig. 5h). The sediments in P1s1-3 are conglomerate and gravelly coarse sandstone with massive beddings (Fig. 5i). In thin sections, from P1s1-1 to P1s1-3, the content of quartz decreases, while the content of lithic increases. In addition, the percentage of sandstone increases while that of mudstone decreases from P1s1-1 to P1s1-3 (Table 2).

    Table  2.  Clastic composition in sandstone and lithology percentage in the Daniudi Gas Field
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The braided delta in P1s1-1 is the smallest of the three sequences or submembers.The braided channels extend below the sea level for a short distance. The terrigenous sediments deposit quickly and then form mouth bar and interdistributary in the Daniudi Gas Field. The braided delta extends longer in P1s1-2 and P1s1-3 and grows increasingly larger (Fig. 6). Based on the regular changes in lithology, succession, clastic composition, and the vertical facies stacking patterns shown in Fig. 6, we propose that the braided delta is progradational in the three submembers in northeastern Ordos Basin.

    Both Heidaigou outcrop and the Daniudi Gas Field can be divided into three sequences. The HST of SQ3 at Heidaigou is eroded by the conglomerate in the upper member of Shanxi Formation. All three sequences consist of three systems tracts: the lowstand systems tract, the transgressive systems tract, and the highstand systems tract at Heidaigou outcrop and in the Daniudi Gas Field.

    Braided stream forms the LSTs in SQ1 at Heidaigou outcrop, while the LSTs became braided delta front in the Daniudi Gas Field. The shoreline, where braided river enters the water, is between Heidaigou outcrop and the Daniudi Gas Field (Fig. 7).

    Figure  7.  Sedimentary facies lateral trends from Heidaigou outcrop to Daniudi Gas Field in the lower member of Shanxi Formation.

    Sandstones in the three sequences or submembers are mostly contained in the LSTs. The depositional environment of the LSTs of the lower member of Shanxi Formation is braided delta front in the Daniudi Gas Field (Fig. 8). As shown in Fig. 7, the sedimentary facies are subaqueous braided channel, mouth bar, and interdistributary.

    Figure  8.  Sedimentary facies and gas-pool distribution in the LST of SQ1 in the lower member of Shanxi Formation in the Daniudi Gas Field.

    According to statistical analysis, the wells whose gas production varies from (2–10)×104 m3/d are mainly located in the mouth-bar sandstones. The wells whose gas production varies (0.5–2)×104 m3/d are mainly located in the subaqueous braided channel sandstone (Fig. 8).

    The sandstone of braided delta front deposited in the LSTs of the three sequences is a potential reservoir. In addition, gas production in mouth-bar sandstones is higher than in subaqueous braided channels.

    Based on observations of cores and outcrop and examination of well-log response data, we suggest that the lower member of Shanxi Formation was deposited in the following sedimentary facies or subfacies: subaqueous braided channel, subaqueous interdistributary, mouth bar, swamp and shelf in the Daniudi Gas Field and braided channel, shelf and shallow lake at Heidaigou outcrop. The lower member of Shanxi Formation deposits a progradational braided delta in the northeastern Ordos Basin.

    The lower member of Shanxi Formation can be divided into three third-order sequences, SQ1, SQ2, and SQ3, in the Daniudi Gas Field and Heidaigou outcrop. Each sequence consists of three systems tracts: the lowstand systems tract, the transgressive systems tract and the highstand systems tract. Detailed sedimentological and stratigraphic analyses indicate that the entire sequence is characterized by a regional regression with braided-channel deposits marking the bases of each retrogradational sequence, shelf mudstone as the TSTs and shallow lake sandstone deposits as the HSTs. In addition, in the Daniudi Gas Field, the braided delta-front deposits form the LSTs of each sequence with shelf as the TSTs and swamp as the HSTs.

    In the Daniudi Gas Field, the sand bodies of mouth bar in braided delta front, which form the LSTs of each sequence, are excellent reservoirs.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This study was supported by the China National Key Research Project (No. 2011ZX05009-002) and the MOE Yangtze River Scholar and Innovative Team Program (No. IRT0864). We also thank Shiyue Chen and Longwei Qiu for their assistance in the field work.
  • Bohacs, K. M., Suter, J., 1997. Sequence Stratigraphic Distribution of Coaly Rocks: Fundamental Controls and Paralic Examples. AAPG Bulletin, 81(10): 1612–1639
    Cao, Z. H., 2005. The Basic Geological Characteristics of the Daniudi Gas Field in Ordos Basin. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 27(2): 17–22 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/294774852_The_basic_geological_characteristics_of_the_Daniudi_compound_gas_field_in_E'erduosi_basin
    Chang, X. H., Wang, Y. B., Han, D. Q., 2004. Reservoir Characteristics of Lower Xiashihezi Formation in Daniudi Gas Field. Natural Gas Industry, 24(11): 19–21 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Chen, H. D., Hou, Z. J., Tian, J. C., et al., 2001. Study on Sequence Stratigraphy of Continental Deposits in Ordos Basin during Later Paleozoic Era. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 21(3): 114–123 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/282387368_The_sequence_stratigraphy_of_continental_deposits_in_the_Ordos_basin_during_the_Late_Palaeozoic
    Chen, J. L., Wu, L., Cui, J. J., 2004, The Sedimentography Characteristics of Daniudi Gas Field. Journal of Jiaozuo Institute of Technology (Natural Science), 23(2): 89–94 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JGXB200402003.htm
    Cornel, O., Janokp, B., 2006. Terminal Distributary Channels and Delta Front Architecture of River-Dominated Delta Systems. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 76(1–2): 212–233, doi: 10.2110/jsr.2006.026
    Dou, W. T., Hou, M. C., Dong, G. Y., 2009. Provenance Analysis of the Upper Paleozoic Shanxi to Lower Shihezi Formations in North Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 29(3): 25–28 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Fan, T. L., Guo, Q. J., Wu, X. S., 1999. Features of Sequence Stratigraphy and Distribution Regularities of Upper Paleozoic Reservoir Rocks in Northern the Ordos Basin, China. Geoscience, 13(1): 32–36 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ901.004.htm
    Hao, S. M., Hui, K. Y., Li, L., 2006. Reservoiring Features of Daniudi Low-Permeability Gas Field in Ordos Basin and Its Exploration and Development Technologies. Oil & Gas Geology, 27(6): 762–768 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/306278105_Reservoiring_features_of_Daniudi_low-permeability_gas_field_in_Ordos_basin_and_its_exploration_and_development_technologies
    Hao, S. M., Li, L., You, H. Z., 2007. Permo-Carboniferous Paralic Depositional Systems in the Daniudi Gas Field and Its Near-Source Box-Type Gas Accumulation-Forming Model. Geology in China, 34(4): 606–611 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/287865714_Permo-Carboniferous_paralic_depositional_systems_in_the_Daniudi_gas_field_and_its_near-source_box-type_gas_accumulation-forming_model
    Han, D. X., Yang, Q., 1980. Coalfield Geology of China. In: Han, D. X., Yang, Q., eds., Coalfield Geology of China. China Coal Industry Publishing House, Beijing. 415 (in Chinese)
    He, Y. Z., Chen, H. D., Zhang, J. Q., 2001. Discussion on Sedimentation Mechanism of Two Kind Deltas from Permian-Carboniferous of Central Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 22(1): 68–71 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/284081026_Discussion_on_sedimentation_mechanism_of_two_kind_deltas_from_Permian-Carboniferous_of_Central_Ordos_basin_J
    Jiang, Z. X., 2003. Sedimentology. In: Jiang, Z. X., Chen, S. Y., Yang, J. P., eds., Sedimentology. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing. 76–90 (in Chinese)
    Li, G. Y., Lu, M. G., 2002. Atlas of Chinese Petroliferous Basins. In: Li, G. Y., Lu, M. G., eds., Atlas of Chinese Petroliferous Basins. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing. 199–209 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Li, W. H., Qu, H. J., Wei, H. H., et al., 2003. Sequence Sratigraphy of Late Paleozoic Deposits in Suligemiao Area, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Stratigraphy, 27(1): 41–76 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/285428759_Sequence_sratigraphy_of_late_Paleozoic_deposits_in_Suligemiao_area_Inner_Mongolia
    Shao, L. Y., Zhang, P. F., Hilton, J., et al., 2003. Paleoenvironments and Paleogeography of the Lower and Lower Middle Jurassic Coal Measures in the Turpan-Hami Oil-Prone Coal Basin, Northwestern China. AAPG Bulletin, 87(2): 335–355 doi: 10.1306/09160200936
    Van Wagoner, J. C., Mitchum, R. M., Campion, K. M., 1990. Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy in Well Logs, Cores and Outcrops. In: Helwig, J., Howell, G. D., eds., AAPG Methods in Exploration Series. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Oklahoma. 7: 2–8
    Wang, J., Shen, G. L., 2000. A New Species of Discinites (Noeggerathiales) from the Upper Permian of Weibei Coalfield, North China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 110(3): 175–190 http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000035104241910_a618.html
    Wang, Z. J., Chen, H. D., Zhang, J. Q., 2002. The Late Palaeozoic Sedimentary Systems and Humic Gas Pools in the Ordos Basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 22(2): 18–23 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Ye, L. M., Qi, T. J., 2008. Depositional Environment Analysis of Shanxi Formation in Eastern Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 26(2): 202–209 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95994X/20082/26894759.html
    Zhai, A. J., Deng, H. W., 1999. Sequence Stratigraphy and Reservoir Prediction of Upper Palaeozoic in the Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 20(4): 336–340 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://ogg.pepris.com/en/y1999/v20/i4/336
    Zhang, G. Q., Chen, S. W., Guo, S. Y., 2011. Sedimentary Facies of the Shanxi Formation in Daniudi Gas Field, Northeastern Ordos Area. Oil & Gas Geology, 32(3): 388–396 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syytrqdz201103011
    Zhang, P. F., 2003. Some Considerations on Coal Measures Sedimentology. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 21(1): 125–128 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.cjxb.ac.cn/EN/abstract/abstract2472.shtml
    Zhang, Z. L., Sun, K. Q., Yin, J. R., 1997. Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Shanxi Formation (Lower Permian) in the Northwestern Ordos Basin, China: An Alternative Sequence Model for Fluvial Strata. Sedimentary Geology, 112: 123–136 doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(97)00029-8
    Zhu, C. J., Wang, Y. B., 2010. Characteristic Analysis of Coal Forming in the Coal-Bearing Formation of Paleozoic in the Northeast of Ordos Basin. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 30(6): 687–692 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Zhu, X. M., Kang, A., Wang, G. W., et al., 2002. The Upper Paleozoic Sequence Stratigraphic and Sedimentary System Characteristics of the Southwest Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 24(4): 327–333 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_sysydz200204008.aspx
    Zhu, H. T., Chen, K. Y., Liu, K. Y., et al., 2007. Evidences for Deposits of Fluvial Facies in Shanxi Formation in Northern Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 27(12): 68–70 (in Chinese with English Abstract) http://www.trqgy.cn/EN/Y2007/V27/I12/68
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Jiaqiang Zhang, Zhen Qiu, Weiliang Kong, Wenjiao Xiao. Late Ordovician volcanic ash deposition in the southwestern Yangtze Shelf: Evidence for arc magmatism in the Wuyi-Yunkai Orogen[J]. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-025-0239-9
    [2]Qibiao Zang, Chenglin Liu, Sarwar Awan Rizwan, Xiya Yang, Zhendong Lu, Guoxiong Li, Yuping Wu, Dehao Feng. Occurrence Models of Movable Fluid in Lacustrine Sandstone Reservoir of Chang 7 Member in the Heshui Block, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2025, 36(1): 57-74. doi: 10.1007/s12583-021-1598-5
    [3]Haihai Hou, Longyi Shao, Yue Tang, Yanan Li, Guodong Liang, Yilin Xin, Jiaqiang Zhang. Coal Seam Correlation in Terrestrial Basins by Sequence Stratigraphy and Its Implications for Paleoclimate and Paleoenvironment Evolution[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2023, 34(2): 556-570. doi: 10.1007/s12583-020-1069-4
    [4]Mohamed Tawfik, Abelbaset S. El-Sorogy, Khaled Al-Kahtany. Facies Associations and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Toarcian Marrat Formation (Saudi Arabia) and Their Equivalents in Some Gondwanaland Regions[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2023, 34(1): 242-259. doi: 10.1007/s12583-020-1379-6
    [5]Fan Zhang, Yangquan Jiao, Liqun Wu, Hui Rong, Longhui Wang. Relations of Uranium Enrichment and Carbonaceous Debris within the Daying Uranium Deposit, Northern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2019, 30(1): 142-157. doi: 10.1007/s12583-017-0952-0
    [6]Longzhang Wang, Liyun Wang, Ping'an Peng, Tongmo Dai, Dayong Liu. A Thermal Event in the Ordos Basin: Insights from Illite 40Ar-39Ar Dating with Regression Analysis[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2018, 29(3): 629-638. doi: 10.1007/s12583-017-0903-7
    [7]Longwei Qiu, Shengchao Yang, Changsheng Qu, Ningning Xu, Qingsong Gao, Xiangjin Zhang, Xugang Liu, Donghui Wang. A Comprehensive Porosity Prediction Model for the Upper Paleozoic Tight Sandstone Reservoir in the Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2017, 28(6): 1086-1096. doi: 10.1007/s12583-016-0935-2
    [8]Wei Du, Zaixing Jiang, Qing Li, Ying Zhang. Sedimentary characterization of the Upper Paleozoic coal-bearing tight sand strata, Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2016, 27(5): 823-834. doi: 10.1007/s12583-016-0705-5
    [9]Yizhen Li, Xingzhi Wang, Bin Wu, Guoqin Li, Dule Wang. Sedimentary facies of marine shale gas formations in Southern China: The Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2016, 27(5): 807-822. doi: 10.1007/s12583-015-0592-1
    [10]Jinfeng Ren, Hua Wang, Ming Sun, Huajun Gan, Guangzeng Song, Zhipeng Sun. Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Facies of Lower Oligocene Yacheng Formation in Deepwater Area of Qiongdongnan Basin, Northern South China Sea: Implications for Coal-Bearing Source Rocks[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2014, 25(5): 871-883. doi: 10.1007/s12583-014-0479-6
    [11]Senhu Lin, Xuanjun Yuan, Shizhen Tao, Zhi Yang, Songtao Wu. Geochemical Characteristics of the Source Rocks in Mesozoic Yanchang Formation, Central Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(5): 804-814. doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0379-1
    [12]Gang Chen; Shuheng Li; Huiruo Zhang; Fu Yang; Chao Ding; Panpan Lei; Yanxu Hu. Fluid Inclusion Analysis for Constraining the Hydrocarbon Accumulation Periods of the Permian Reservoirs in Northeast Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(4). doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0354-x
    [13]Mingsheng Lü, Kaiyuan Chen, Liangqing Xue, Liping Yi, Hongtao Zhu. High-Resolution Transgressive-Regressive Sequence Stratigraphy of Chang 8 Member of Yanchang Formation in Southwestern Ordos Basin, Northern China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2010, 21(4): 423-438. doi: 10.1007/s12583-010-0105-1
    [14]Hongtao Zhu, Yuansheng Du, Keyu Liu, Jiaxin Yan, Yajun Xu, Ping Yang, Xinyu Liu. Sequence Stratigraphic Delineation and Correlation of the Dongying Formation in the Nearshore and Adjacent Sea Areas, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2008, 19(1): 54-64.
    [15]Mingxiang Mei, Yongsheng Ma, Jun Deng, Qingfen Meng, Donghai Li. Sequence-Stratigraphic Framework from the Carboniferous to the Permian Chuanshanian Epoch in Dianqiangui Basin and Its Adjacent Areas, Southwest China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2005, 16(3): 231-249.
    [16]Yangquan Jiao, Jiaxin Yan, Sitian Li, Ruiqi Yang, Fengjiang Lang, Shengke Yang. Character of Terrestrial Sequence Stratigraphy and Depositional System in Incised Valley, Outcrop Area of Karamay Oilfield, Junggar Basin, China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2004, 15(3): 324-334.
    [17]Anwei Fei, Zhongtao Zhang. Middle Ordovician Bioturbation Structures from Southeastern Margin of Ordos Basin and Their Environmentary Interpretation[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2002, 13(4): 321-329.
    [18]Xiongfei Cai, Yansheng Gu, Dehui Wang, Zejun Zhang, Bing Chen. Analyses of Sequence Stratigraphy and Environments across Permian-Triassic Boundary in Liaotian, Northwestern Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2002, 13(2): 189-191.
    [19]Hongzhen Wang. Problems of Sequence Stratigraphy in China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2000, 11(3): 204-214.
    [20]Xiaoying Shi. Triassic Sequence Stratigraphy and Sea-Level Changes in Qomolongma Area, Southern Tibet, China: From Epicontinental Sea to Rift Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2000, 11(3): 241-251.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 47.1 %FULLTEXT: 47.1 %META: 51.7 %META: 51.7 %PDF: 1.1 %PDF: 1.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.0 %其他: 2.0 %China: 57.7 %China: 57.7 %India: 0.6 %India: 0.6 %Reserved: 7.7 %Reserved: 7.7 %Russian Federation: 11.1 %Russian Federation: 11.1 %United States: 20.0 %United States: 20.0 %南昌: 0.9 %南昌: 0.9 %其他ChinaIndiaReservedRussian FederationUnited States南昌

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(698) PDF downloads(74) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return