Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Volume 25 Issue 2
Apr 2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Journal of Earth Science  > 2014  >  25(2): 407-412.
Xiaogang Ma, Peter Fox, Eric Rozell, Patrick West, Stephan Zednik. Ontology Dynamics in a Data Life Cycle: Challenges and Recommendations from a Geoscience Perspective. Journal of Earth Science, 2014, 25(2): 407-412. doi: 10.1007/s12583-014-0408-8
Citation: Xiaogang Ma, Peter Fox, Eric Rozell, Patrick West, Stephan Zednik. Ontology Dynamics in a Data Life Cycle: Challenges and Recommendations from a Geoscience Perspective. Journal of Earth Science, 2014, 25(2): 407-412. doi: 10.1007/s12583-014-0408-8
shu

Ontology Dynamics in a Data Life Cycle: Challenges and Recommendations from a Geoscience Perspective

doi: 10.1007/s12583-014-0408-8

  • Tetherless World Constellation, School of Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, USA

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Xiaogang Ma, max7@rpi.edu
  • Received Date: 19 Sep 2013
  • Accepted Date: 03 Mar 2014
  • Publish Date: 01 Apr 2014
    Abstract
  • Ontologies are increasingly deployed as a computer-accessible representation of key semantics in various parts of a data life cycle and, thus, ontology dynamics may pose challenges to data management and re-use. By using examples in the field of geosciences, we analyze challenges raised by ontology dynamics, such as heavy reworking of data, semantic heterogeneity among data providers and users, and error propagation in cross-discipline data discovery and re-use. We also make recommendations to address these challenges: (1) communities of practice on ontologies to reduce inconsistency and duplicated efforts; (2) use ontologies in the procedure of data collection and make them accessible to data users; and (3) seek methods to speed up the reworking of data in a Semantic Web context.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(33)
  • Allen, D., Schuurman, N., Deshpande, A., et al., 2008. Data Integration and Standardization in Cross-Border Hydrogeological Studies: A Novel Approach to Hydrostratigraphic Model Development. Environmental Geology, 53(7): 1441–1453 doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0753-3
    Bates, R. L., Jackson, J. A., 1995. Glossary of Geology, 3rd Edition. American Geological Institute, Alexandria, VA. 788
    Bell, D., Qi, G., Liu, W., 2007. Approaches to Inconsistency Handling in Description-Logic Based Ontologies. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P., eds., On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: Otm 2007 Workshops, Pt 2, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 1303–1311
    British Geological Survey, 2012. British Geological Survey Taxonomy Online. https://www.bgs.ac.uk/taxonomy/home.html. Accessed on July 08, 2012
    Brodaric, B., 2004. The Design of GSC FieldLog: Ontology-Based Software for Computer Aided Geological Field Mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 30(1): 5–20
    Brodaric, B., 2012. Characterizing and Representing Inference Histories in Geologic Mapping. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(2): 265–281 doi: 10.1080/13658816.2011.585992
    CCOP, CIFEG, 2006. Asian Multilingual Thesaurus of Geosciences. Coordinating Committee for Geoscience Programmes in East and Southeast Asia (CCOP), Bangkok, Thailand and Centre International pour la Formation et les Echanges en Géosciences (CIFEG), Orléans. 563
    Cox, S. J., 2011. OWL Representation of the Geologic Timescale Implementing Stratigraphic Best Practice. Proceedings of AGU 2011 Fall Meeting, San Francisco. Abstract IN31B-1440
    Cox, S. J., 2012. Vocabularies of Geologic Time Scale. http://resource.geosciml.org/vocabulary/timescale. Accessed on September 6, 2012
    Cox, S. J. D., Richard, S. M., 2005. A Formal Model for the Geologic Time Scale and Global Stratotype Section and Point, Compatible with Geospatial Information Transfer Standards. Geosphere, 1(3): 119–137 doi: 10.1130/GES00022.1
    Flouris, G., D'Aquin, M., Antoniou, G., et al., 2009. Special Issue on Ontology Dynamics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 19(5): 717–719 doi: 10.1093/logcom/exn046
    Flouris, G., Manakanatas, D., Kondylakis, H., et al., 2008. Ontology Change: Classification and Survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 23(2): 117–152 doi: 10.1017/S0269888908001367
    Geo-Data Informatics Workshop Committee, 2011. NSF GeoData Informatics: Exploring the Life Cycle, Citation and Integration of Geo-Data (Workshop Report). http://tw.rpi.edu/media/latest/WorkshopReport_GeoData2011.pdf. Accessed on July 4, 2012
    Gruber, T. R., 1995. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5–6): 907–928 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581985710816
    Guarino, N., 1997. Understanding, Building and Using Ontologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(2–3): 293–310
    Han, L., Finin, T., Parr, C., et al., 2008. RDF123: from Spreadsheets to RDF. In: Sheth, A., Staab, S., Dean, M., et al., eds., The Semantic Web-ISWC 2008, LNCS vol. 5318. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 451–466
    International Commission on Stratigraphy, 2012. Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the International Commission of Stratigraphy. http://www.stratigraphy.org/column.php?id=GSSPs. Accessed on July 31, 2012
    Janowicz, K., Hitzler, P., 2012. The Digital Earth as Knowledge Engine. Semantic Web, 3(3): 213–221 doi: 10.3233/SW-2012-0070
    Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D., 2011. Ontology Evolution in Data Integration: Query Rewriting to the Rescue. Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T. W., eds., Conceptual Modeling-ER 2011, LNCS vol., 6998. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 393–401
    Laxton, J., Serrano, J. J., Tellez-Arenas, A., 2010. Geological Applications Using Geospatial Standards-An Example from OneGeology-Europe and GeoSciML. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(Supp1. ): 31–49 http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000038012873410_0b73.html
    Ma, X., Asch, K., Laxton, J. L., et al., 2011a. Data Exchange Facilitated. Nature Geoscience, 4(12): 814 doi: 10.1038/ngeo1335
    Ma, X., Carranza, E. J. M., Wu, C., et al., 2011b. A SKOSBased Multilingual Thesaurus of Geological Time Scale for Interoperability of Online Geological Maps. Computers & Geosciences, 37(10): 1602–1615 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300411000744
    Ma, X., Fox, P., 2013. Recent Progress on Geologic Time Ontologies and Considerations for Future Works. Earth Science Informatics, 6(1): 31–46 doi: 10.1007/s12145-013-0110-x
    Ma, X., Wu, C., Carranza, E. J. M., et al., 2010. Development of a Controlled Vocabulary for Semantic Interoperability of Mineral Exploration Geodata for Mining Projects. Computers & Geosciences, 36(12): 1512–1522 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009830041000261X
    Mascarelli, A. L., 2009. Quaternary Geologists Win Timescale Vote. Nature, 459: 624 doi: 10.1038/459624a
    McGuinness, D. L., 2003. Ontologies Come of Age. Fensel, D., Hendler, J., Lieberman, H., et al., eds., Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. MIT Press, Cambridge. 171–196
    NADM Steering Committee, 2004. NADM Conceptual Model 1.0-A conceptual Model For Geologic Map Information: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1334, North American Geologic Map Data Model (NADM) Steering Committee, Reston. 58
    Noy, N. F., Musen, M. A., 2004. Ontology Versioning in an Ontology Management Framework. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(4): 6–13 doi: 10.1109/MIS.2004.33
    Obrst, L., 2003. Ontologies for Semantically Interoperable Systems. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, New Orleans. 366–369
    Raskin, R. G., Pan, M. J., 2005. Knowledge Representation in the Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET). Computers & Geosciences, 31(9): 1119–1125 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300405001020
    Sen, M., Duffy, T., 2005. GeoSciML: Development of a Generic GeoScience Markup Language. Computers & Geosciences, 31(9): 1095–1103
    Soller, D., Berg, T., 2005. The U.S. National Geologic Map Database Project: Overview & Progress. Ostaficzuk, S. R., ed., The Current Role of Geological Mapping in Geosciences. Springer, Dordrecht. 245–277
    Spencer, S., 2012. What is DDI? http://www.ddialliance.org/what. Accessed on July 4, 2012
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views(787) PDF downloads(122) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2013-2020 Journal of Earth Science 鄂ICP备15021562号-2

    Tel: +86-27-67885075 Fax: +86-27-67885075 E-mail: xbb@cug.edu.cn

    Address: Editorial Office of Journal, China University of Geosciences, Yujiashan, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, P. R. China

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  E-mail: info@rhhz.net  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return