Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Volume 27 Issue 1
Feb 2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Brad Walker. Comparison of the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mississippi River and the Yolo Bypass, Sacramento River. Journal of Earth Science, 2016, 27(1): 47-54. doi: 10.1007/s12583-016-0628-1
Citation: Brad Walker. Comparison of the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mississippi River and the Yolo Bypass, Sacramento River. Journal of Earth Science, 2016, 27(1): 47-54. doi: 10.1007/s12583-016-0628-1

Comparison of the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mississippi River and the Yolo Bypass, Sacramento River

doi: 10.1007/s12583-016-0628-1
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Brad Walker, bwalker@moenviron.org
  • Received Date: 21 Aug 2014
  • Accepted Date: 18 Nov 2014
  • Publish Date: 01 Feb 2016
  • The Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway (BP-NMF) and the Yolo Bypass, located on the Mississippi and Sacramento rivers, respectively, are agriculture areas that were once each part of vast wetlands but are now intermittently used for flood control. Here the similarity stops, the BP-NMF has been used to convey floodwaters only twice in nearly 80 years, while the Yolo Bypass is used for this purpose on average every other year. The consequences are greatly different. In 2011, the BP-NMF was activated through the explosive detonation of the 'fuse plug" portion of its levees, resulting in elevated property and economic damages, crop losses, and litigation. High-energy flows following the opening of the BP-NMF scour coarse sediment in the vicinity of the opening of the BP-NMF and deposit this material within the floodway, including on agricultural fields. In general the environment of much of the BP-NMF provides poor wildlife habitat. In contrast, the routine operation of Yolo Bypass is expected, avoids damage and litigation, supplies organic-rich sediment to fields, and provides good wildlife habitat. The difference between the two systems is attributed to a better approximation of natural conditions on the Yolo Bypass.

     

  • loading
  • CA-DWR (State of California, Department of Water Resources), 2010. Sacramento River Flood Control Project Weirs and Relief Structures-Fact Sheet. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA
    Camillo, C. A., 2012. Divine Providence: The 2011 Flood in the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project. Mississippi River Commission, Vicksburg, Mississippi
    Criss, R. E., 2003. Character and Origin of Flood Waters. In: Criss, R. E., Wilson, D. A., eds., At the Confluence: Rivers, Floods, and Water Quality in the St. Louis Region. MBG Press, St. Louis. 75-87
    Heitmeyer, M., 2010. St. Johns and New Madrid Floodway Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Assessment of Historic Land Cover for the SJBNMF Region, Appendix D Part 2-Historic Conditions. Greenbrier Wetland Services, Advance, Missouri
    Joiner, J., 2010. Swamps to Cotton, Rural Missouri, Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives. [2015-12-21]. http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mostodd2/history/swampstocotton.htm
    Kelley, R., 1998. Battling the Inland Sea. University of California Press, Oakland, California
    Mississippi River Commission (MRC), 2008. The Mississippi River & Tributaries Project: Bird Point-New Madrid Floodway-Information Paper. [2015-12-21]. http://www.mvd.usace.army.mil/Portals/52/docs/Birds%20Point-New%20Madrid%20info%20paper%20FINAL%200426.pdf
    Mississippi River Commission (MRC), 2013. Protecting the Alluvial Empire-The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2012a. United States Flood Loss Report-Water Year 2011
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2012b. Spring 2011 Middle and Lower Mississippi, River Valley Floods
    Risk Management Solutions Inc., 2007. The 1927 Great Mississippi Flood: 80-Year Retrospective. Newark, CA
    Sommer, T. R., Harrell, W. C., Nobriga, M. L., 2005. Habitat Use and Stranding Risk of Juvenile Chinook Salmon on a Seasonal Floodplain. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 25(4): 1493–1504. doi: 10.1577/m04-208.1
    Sommer, T. R., Harrell, W. C., Nobriga, M. L., et al., 2001. California's Yolo Bypass: Evidence that Flood Control can be Compatible with Fisheries, Wetlands, Wildlife, and Agriculture, Fisheries. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD
    US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 1985. Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, MO-Final Informational Technical Report: Structural Alternatives. Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Mississippi
    US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2006. St. Johns and New Madrid Floodway Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway Operation-Appendix K. Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Mississippi
    US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2012. Mississippi River and Tributaries-2011 Post-Flood Report. Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Mississippi
    US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2013. Phase 1 Informational Technical Report: Non-Explosive Alternatives for the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway. Mississippi Valley Division, Vicksburg, Mississippi
    Walker, B., 2012. Statement to the Mississippi River Commission on Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway Operation. Alton, Illinois
    Whipple, A. A., Grossinger, R. M., Rankin, D., et al., 2012. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Historical Ecology Investigation: Exploring Pattern and Process. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game and Ecosystem Restoration Program. A Report of SFEI-ASC's Historical Ecology Program, Publication #672. San Francisco Estuary Institute-Aquatic Science Center, Richmond, CA
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(621) PDF downloads(291) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return