Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Ruyang Yu, Shu Jiang, Yinhui Zuo, Kai Zhang, Guangzheng Jiang, Chao Zhang, Yiyu Yao. Robust and Interpretable Boosting-Based Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Predicting Production Temperature in a Geopressured Geothermal System of the Yinggehai Basin, South China Sea. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-026-0186-0
Citation: Ruyang Yu, Shu Jiang, Yinhui Zuo, Kai Zhang, Guangzheng Jiang, Chao Zhang, Yiyu Yao. Robust and Interpretable Boosting-Based Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Predicting Production Temperature in a Geopressured Geothermal System of the Yinggehai Basin, South China Sea. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-026-0186-0

Robust and Interpretable Boosting-Based Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Predicting Production Temperature in a Geopressured Geothermal System of the Yinggehai Basin, South China Sea

doi: 10.1007/s12583-026-0186-0
Funds:

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 42502309), the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant no. GZC20250308), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant no. 2026M790469), the Sichuan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant no. 2026NSFSC1145) and the National Key Research & Development Program of China (Grant nos. 2022YFF0801202 and 2022YFF0801200).

  • Available Online: 16 Oct 2026
  • Accurate prediction of production temperature (PT) is essential for optimizing the design and operation of geothermal systems. However, most machine learning (ML) studies emphasize accuracy while neglecting statistical significance, uncertainty quantification and interpretability. This study develops a robust and interpretable boosting-based ensemble ML model for PT prediction in a geopressured geothermal system in the Dongfang area of the Yinggehai Basin. A dataset of 581 samples was generated from coupled reservoir—wellbore simulations. Six boosting-based ensemble ML models—AdaBoost, GBDT, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost and NGBoost—were developed and evaluated using conventional metrics, Wilcoxon signed—rank tests, bootstrap-based uncertainty assessment and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). XGBoost achieved the best test performance, with a mean absolute percentage error of 0.370%, a root mean square error of 0.619℃ and an R2 of 0.998. No significant difference was detected between XGBoost and CatBoost (p =0.058 and |z|=1.896). Among the three models evaluated by bootstrap analysis, XGBoost showed the lowest prediction variability. SHAP analysis identified well spacing as the most influential feature and quantified global and instance-specific contributions. Overall, XGBoost provides accurate, robust and interpretable PT predictions, offering an efficient surrogate within the investigated design space.

     

  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views(7) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return