Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Wendong Yang, Quanmin Xie, Yuanyou Xia, Xinping Li. Reinforcing a Dangerous Rock Mass Using the Flexible Network Method. Journal of Earth Science, 2005, 16(4): 354-358.
Citation: Wendong Yang, Quanmin Xie, Yuanyou Xia, Xinping Li. Reinforcing a Dangerous Rock Mass Using the Flexible Network Method. Journal of Earth Science, 2005, 16(4): 354-358.

Reinforcing a Dangerous Rock Mass Using the Flexible Network Method

Funds:

the Scientific & Technical Key Project of Hubei Province 2004AA306B03

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 49902022

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Yang Wendong, ywd@mail.whut.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 22 May 2005
  • Accepted Date: 25 Aug 2005
  • Because the main failure type of a dangerous rock mass is collapse, the treatment of such a mass should focus on controlling collapse failure.When treating dangerous rock masses, disturbing the mass (e.g.by blasting) needs to be avoided, as this new damage could cause collapse. So the self-bearing capacity of the mountain mass must be used to treat the dangerous rock mass. This article is based on a practical example of the control of a dangerous rock mass at Banyan Mountain, Huangshi, Hubei Province.On the basis of an analysis of damage mechanism and the stability of the dangerous rock mass, a flexible network reinforcement method was designed to prevent the collapse of the rock mass.The deformations of section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass before and after the flexible network reinforcement were calculated using the two-dimensional finite element method.The results show that the maximum deformation reduced by 55% after the application of the flexible network reinforcement, from 45.99 to 20.75 mm, which demonstrates that the flexible network method is effective, and can provide some scientific basis for the treatment of dangerous rock masses.

     

  • The dangerous rock mass discussed in this paper is found on Banyan Mountain, Huangshi, Hubei Province. It is mainly dispersed on the top of a threegrade declivity to the north-east. The dangerous rock mass is made up of four separate masses named respectively Ⅰw, Ⅱw, Ⅲw and Ⅳw. Figure 1 is a sketch diagram of the structure of the dangerous rock mass. The direction of rock formation is opposite to the dip of the slope. The direction of the rock formation is 150° -158°, and its dip angle is 15° -29°. The rocks are limestones(T1dy2-1-T1dy3-2), which belong to the second to third lithologic section of the Daye Group. There are over 40 developed fissures in the dangerous area, including three fissure groups, which exist from west-north, east-north and westeast. The fissures are mainly dispersed on the top of the dangerous rock mass slope, and their dip angles are from 80° to vertical. The cliff forelands of the rock masses are dissected by tension cracks or structural fractures, and upright and isolated rock-pillar masses are often seen. Though these rock-pillar masses are different in bulk, they have common characteristics. The low-dip angle of the rock formation inclines to the dome; the slope degree of the rockpillars is large and close to vertical; the fissures are also close to vertical, inclining to the outside of the dome. In this type of rock mass slope, the failure of the rock-pillar masses is mainly collapse due to such forces as earthquake, blasting, or water pressure (Deng et al., 1998; Wuhan University of Technology, 1996).

    Figure  1.  Sketch diagram of structure of the dangerous rock mass.

    The actions of the self-gravitation of the rock mass, earthquake force and hydraulic pressure are taken into account, and the force analysis of the dangerous rock mass is shown in Fig. 2.

    Figure  2.  Force analysis of collapse.

    The anti-collapse stability coefficient of the dangerous rock mass is

    (1)

    where KTis the anti-collapse stability coefficient; MR is the anti-collapse moment of force; MS is the collapse moment of force.

    According to the collapse force analysis of the dangerous rock mass(Fig. 2), we have

    (2)

    (3)

    So its anti-collapse stability coefficient is

    (4)

    where Ti is the tension of the cable; B is the width of the collapsible rock mass; θ is the angle of inclination of tension to the horizontal; Hi is the vertical distance from collapse rotary spot to the hydraulic pressure's agent line; KD is the coefficient of an earthquake; G is the weight of the collapsible rock mass; hi is the height of the collapsible rock mass; Ui is hydraulic pressure.

    Taking section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass as an example, the anti-collapse stability coefficient is calculated(where Ti= 0)to be KT= 1.02.

    Because the main type of failure of the dangerous rock mass is collapse, treatment should be focused on controlling a potential collapse. When treating the rock mass, a large disturbance such as blasting should be avoided, as this new damage could cause the collapse of the entire mass. So the self-bearing capacity of the mountain mass must be used to treat the dangerous mass. The flexible network reinforcement method is presented in the paper. It is an anchoring-pulling-grounting network reinforcement system(Fig. 3). Firstly, the vertical pre-stress anchor is used to reinforce the dangerous rock mass. Secondly, all rock-pillar masses are locked by prestressed cables and reinforcing bar nets. Finally, shotcrete is applied to the area so that the rock pillars form one whole. As such the whole dangerous rock mass system changes from a static structure system to a super-static structure system. The system has some flexibility and permits the rock masses to have suitable deformations. When the deformation pressure is near the reinforcement zones, the variation of the stress is harmonized and the stress is released rationally. So plastic areas are not excessively developed, the strength of the rock mass is maintained, and the selfbearing capacity of the rock mass is fully brought into play. The effort of the mountain mass is borne by the rock mass and the reinforcement system.

    Figure  3.  Sketch diagram of structure of reinforcement of dangerous rock mass with flexible network method. 1. the vertical pre-stress anchor; 2. pre-stress cable; 3. anchorage stone; 4. bar nets; 5. concrete.

    The flexible network reinforcement method can improve the structure of a dangerous rock mass by tying together several parts to make a whole, strengthening the integrity of the dangerous rock mass, heightening its intensity and rigidity, and providing the self-adaptive ability of deformation(Xie and Xia, 2004a, b; Xia and Zhu, 2000, 1998; Xie and Zhu, 2000; Zhu and Wang, 1992; Vaughan and Iscnbcrg, 1991; Goodman and Tayley, 1968).

    Section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass is taken as an example to illustrate the specific design of the flexible network reinforcement.

    The force analysis of the rock bolt is shown in Fig. 4. If the anti-extraction safety coefficient is KB, according to the force decomposition principle, there is

    (5)

    (6)
    Figure  4.  Force analysis of bolt.

    where P is the anchorage force; θ is the angle of inclination tension to the horizontal formation; Ti is the tension of the cable.

    The anti-extraction safety coefficient of the rock bolt in the article is designed to be KB= 2.5. The total anchorage force of section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass is 85 500 kN, and the quantity of the total reinforcement is 1 282 500 kN m. A total of 180Ⅳgrade-cold-pulled reinforcing bars(ϕ35) are used, spaced at 3 m×3 m, each 15 m in length, and the internal anchorage is 5 m long.

    From equation(4), we can obtain

    (7)

    The design value of the anti-collapse safety coefficient of the rock-pillar mass in this paper is KT= 2.0, so the total tension of section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass is 14 000 kN, and the number of the 1 000 kN-grade cables adopted is 14, every cable's mean length is 36 m, spacing is 3 m.

    Anti-shearing strength design is

    (8)

    Compressive strength design is

    (9)

    where A is the sectional area of the reinforcing bar (m2); Tis the cable tension(kN); θ is the angle of inclination of tension to the horizontal; Rs is the design value of the anti-shearing strength of the reinforcing bar(MPa); σc is the compressive strength of the rock mass(MPa); B is the width of the anchorage stone(m); H is the insertion depth into bedrock (m).

    After calculating, the anchorage stone is constructed using the No. 300 cast-in-situ reinforced concrete structure. The anchorage stone's geometric dimensions are 1.0 m×1.0 m×2.0 m, and its parameters are shown in Fig. 5.

    Figure  5.  Sketch diagram of structure of anchorage stone.

    The two-dimensional finite element method was adopted to calculate the deformations of section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass(Zhu and Wang, 1992; Vaughan and Iscnbcrg, 1991; Goodman and Tayley, 1968). The calculation model is as shown in Fig. 6, and see Table 1 for the calculation parameters.

    Figure  6.  Calculation model of dangerous rock mass.
    Table  1.  Calculation parameters of dangerous rock mass
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The deformations of section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass before the treatment and after the flexible network reinforcement are calculated using the twodimensional finite element method and the results are shown in Fig. 7.

    Figure  7.  Two-dimensional finite element analysis of dangerous rock mass.(a)deformation of pretreatment of dangerous rock mass; (b)deformation of post-treatment of dangerous rock mass.

    The maximum deformation of section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass is 45.99 mm before treatment and 20.75 mm after the application of the flexible network reinforcement.

    From the results of the finite element analysis in Fig. 7, it can be concluded that the deformation of section Ⅱw of the dangerous rock mass is significantly reduced after the application of flexible network reinforcement. This shows that the flexible network reinforcement method used to treat a dangerous rock mass is effective. The method thus provides some scientific basis for the treatment of dangerous rock masses.

  • Deng, Y. R., Xu, Z. Y., Shun, J. Y., et al., 1988. Guidebook to the Design of Anchoring& Grounting Support of Underground Engineering. China Railway Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
    Goodman, R. E., Tayley, R. L., 1968. A Model for the Mechanics of Jointed Rock. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE, 94(6): 637-659
    Vaughan, D. K., Iscnbcrg, J., 1991. Stability of Opening in Jointed Rock. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Geo. , 15(4): 433-442
    Wuhan University of Technology, 1996. The Design Report of Controlling Project on Dangerous Rock Masses of the Slate Mountain in Huangshi City(in Chinese)
    Xia, Y. Y., Zhu, R. G., 1998. Multiperson Multilayer Fuzzy Comprehensive Decision Making for Control Plans of Unstable Slopes. Journalo f Natural Disasters, 7(1): 88-91(in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Xia, Y. Y., Zhu, R. G., 2000. Analysis on Control Decision357Reinforcing a Dangerous Rock Mass Using the Flexible Network MethodMaking of Unstable Rockmass in Banyan Mountain, Huangshi City. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 19(4): 498-501(in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Xie, Q. M., Zhu, R. G., 2000. Grey Classification for Evaluating the Stability of Dangerous Rock-Block Masses. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. (Materials Science Edition), 15(1): 73-78
    Xie, Q. M., Xia, Y. Y., 2004a. Systems Theory for Risk Evaluation of Landslide Hazard. Int. J. of Roc. Mech. and Min. Sci. , 41(3): 445-451 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.12.089
    Xie, Q. M., Xia, Y. Y., 2004b. Study on a Multi-objective Decision-Making Method for the Treatment Scheme of Landslide Hazard. J. Beijing Univ. o fSci. and Technol. , 11(2): 101-104(in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Zhu, W. S., Wang, P., 1992. An Equivalence Continuum Model for Jointed Rock Mass and Its Engineering Application. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 14(2): 1-11(in Chinese with English Abstract)
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Jiangxia Wang, Panpan Xu, Hui Qian, Yongqi Zang, Qiming Wang, Zhiyuan Ma. Genesis of geothermal water in the hinterland of Guanzhong Basin, China: Insight from hydrochemical and isotopic analysis[J]. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-025-0202-9
    [2]Yan Zhang, Kai Meng, Xuanmei Fan, Guoqing Chen, Xiangsheng Zheng, Shaojun Li, Tianbin Li, Peng Zeng, Min Xi. Advancements in Laboratory Studies of Layered Rock Masses for Deep Engineering: Insights and Future Perspectives[J]. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-025-2032-1
    [3]Lin Jia, Jing-Sen Cai, Li Wu, Chenyang Ma, Guangjin Liu, Sheng Zhu. A geostatistical approach to incorporate spatial variability of fracture characteristics into fracture network modeling[J]. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-025-0250-1
    [4]Genshen Cao, Huayong Chen, Hao Wang, Weipin Sun. Quartz Trace Element Characteristics and Indication for Exploration in Orogenic Gold Deposits Using Machine Learning[J]. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-025-0249-7
    [5]Wenjie Du, Qian Sheng, Xiaodong Fu, Jian Chen, Jingyu Kang, Xin Pang, Daochun Wan, Wei Yuan. Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing on Dangerous Rock Mass Identification and Deformation Analysis: Case Study of a High-Steep Slope in an Open Pit Mine[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2025, 36(2): 750-763. doi: 10.1007/s12583-023-1813-7
    [6]Zhen Ye, Qiang Xu, Qian Liu, Xiujun Dong, Feng Pu. 3D Distinct Element Back Analysis Based on Rock Structure Modelling of SfM Point Clouds: The Case of the 2019 Pinglu Rockfall of Kaili, China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2024, 35(5): 1568-1582. doi: 10.1007/s12583-022-1667-4
    [7]Jia Wang, Wen Zhang, Donghui Chen, Han Yin, Junqi Chen. Multi-scale structural geological model and quantification of stability evaluation for a high-steep fractured rock slope[J]. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-023-1953-9
    [8]Arie van den Berg, Guus Segal, David A. Yuen. SEPRAN: A Versatile Finite-Element Package for a Wide Variety of Problems in Geosciences[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2015, 26(1): 89-95. doi: 10.1007/s12583-015-0508-0
    [9]Yixin Ye, Xiangyun Hu, Dong Xu. A goal-oriented adaptive finite element method for 3D resistivity modeling using dual-error weighting approach[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2015, 26(6): 821-826. doi: 10.1007/s12583-015-0598-8
    [10]Weida NI, Huiming TANG, Xiao LIU, Rui YONG, Zongxing ZOU. Dynamic stability analysis of wedge in rock slope based on kinetic vector method[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2014, 25(4): 749-756. doi: 10.1007/s12583-014-0462-2
    [11]Gang Chen; Shuheng Li; Huiruo Zhang; Fu Yang; Chao Ding; Panpan Lei; Yanxu Hu. Fluid Inclusion Analysis for Constraining the Hydrocarbon Accumulation Periods of the Permian Reservoirs in Northeast Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(4). doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0354-x
    [12]Shaojun Li, Hui Gao, Demin Xu, Fanzhen Meng. Comprehensive Determination of Reinforcement Parameters for High Cut Slope Based on Intelligent Optimization and Numerical Analysis[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2012, 23(2): 233-242. doi: 10.1007/s12583-012-0250-9
    [13]Md Shofiqul Islam, Ryuichi Shinjo. The Dauki Fault at the Shillong Plateau-Bengal Basin Boundary in Northeastern India: 2D Finite Element Modeling[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2012, 23(6): 854-863. doi: 10.1007/s12583-012-0297-7
    [14]Huiming Tang, Yunfeng Ge, Liangqing Wang, Yi Yuan, Lei Huang, Miaojun Sun. Study on Estimation Method of Rock Mass Discontinuity Shear Strength Based on ThreeDimensional Laser Scanning and Image Technique[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2012, 23(6): 908-913. doi: 10.1007/s12583-012-0301-2
    [15]Zaifeng Liu, Wenhuan Zhan, Yantao Yao, Meizhen Zhan, Dianguang Zhang. Kinematics of Convergence and Deformation in Luzon Island and Adjacent Sea Areas: 2-D Finite-Element Simulation[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2009, 20(1): 107-116. doi: 10.1007/s12583-009-0012-3
    [16]Yingzi Xu, Baiqing Zhang, Huiming Tang. An Analysis for Cross Beam-Ground Anchor Reinforcement[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2005, 16(3): 271-276.
    [17]Li Li, Yuancheng Peng, Xiaohong Long, Ping Liao. Nonlinear Stability Analysis of Long-Span Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge with Thin-Wall High Piers[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2005, 16(1): 72-78.
    [18]Guanfeng An, Kunlong Yin, Huiming Tang. Discrete Element Analysis of Huangtupo Landslide[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2002, 13(1): 83-85.
    [19]Yun'an Li, Xiurun Ge, Huiming Tang. Deformation Control of Deep Excavation Pit and Numerical Simulation with Finite Element Method[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2002, 12(3): 278-288.
    [20]Hongming Yu, Yanxin Hu. Effect Blasting Excavation of Yujiapeng Tunnel on Stability of Nearby Giant Dangerous Rock Masses (DRM)[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2001, 12(2): 142-144.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050246810
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 42.8 %FULLTEXT: 42.8 %META: 56.6 %META: 56.6 %PDF: 0.6 %PDF: 0.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.4 %其他: 2.4 %Australia: 0.6 %Australia: 0.6 %China: 63.2 %China: 63.2 %Japan: 0.6 %Japan: 0.6 %Korea Republic of: 0.6 %Korea Republic of: 0.6 %Other: 0.2 %Other: 0.2 %Reserved: 3.4 %Reserved: 3.4 %Russian Federation: 7.3 %Russian Federation: 7.3 %United States: 21.5 %United States: 21.5 %其他AustraliaChinaJapanKorea Republic ofOtherReservedRussian FederationUnited States

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(747) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return