Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Zhenyao Shen, Guoding Li, Shushen Li. THM Coupled Modeling in Near Field of an Assumed HLW Deep Geological Disposal Repository. Journal of Earth Science, 2004, 15(4): 388-394.
Citation: Zhenyao Shen, Guoding Li, Shushen Li. THM Coupled Modeling in Near Field of an Assumed HLW Deep Geological Disposal Repository. Journal of Earth Science, 2004, 15(4): 388-394.

THM Coupled Modeling in Near Field of an Assumed HLW Deep Geological Disposal Repository

Funds:

the Nuclear Science Fund Project H7196PY505

  • Received Date: 18 Nov 2003
  • Accepted Date: 05 Mar 2004
  • One of the most suitable ways under study for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) is isolation in deep geological repositories.It is very important to research the thermo-hydromechanical (THM) coupled processes associated with an HLW disposal repository.Non-linear coupled equations, which are used to describe the THM coupled process and are suited to saturated-unsaturated porous media, are presented in this paper.A numerical method to solve these equations is put forward, and a finite element code is developed.This code is suited to the plane strain or axis-symmetry problem. Then this code is used to simulate the THM coupled process in the near field of an ideal disposal repository.The temperature vs.time, hydraulic head vs.time and stress vs.time results show that, in this assumed condition, the impact of temperature is very long (over 10000 a) and the impact of the water head is short (about 90 d).Since the stress is induced by temperature and hydraulic head in this condition, the impact time of stress is the same as that of temperature.The results show that THM coupled processes are very important in the safety analysis of an HLW deep geological disposal repository.

     

  • In many countries, disposal in deep geological repositories is one of the most suitable ways under study for the permanent isolation of high-level radioactive waste (HLW).It is of the utmost importance to evaluate the safety of this underground disposal system.An important part of the safety analysis is an assessment of the coupling of thermal, hydraulic and mechanical (THM) processes (Shen et al., 2000b, 1997; Stephansson et al., 1996; Jing et al., 1995) (see Fig. 1).Though the importance of coupled THM processes has been recognized for some years, the current capability of modeling such processes is still uncertain.

    Figure  1.  Coupled THM processes in buffer material (Jing et al., 1995).

    In this paper, based on current knowledge of THM coupled processes in near field, a THM coupled model is presented to describe such processes, and a finite element code is developed.The model and code are then used to simulate the temperature, stress and hydraulic head distribution in the near field of an assumed ideal disposal system.

    (1) The medium is isotropic and pore-elastic; (2) Suitable for a saturated or unsaturated porous medium; (3) Darcy's law is valid for the flow of fluid; (4) Fourier's law holds for heat flux; (5) Teraghi's effective stress principle is valid; (6) Fluid density varies depending upon the temperature and pressure of fluid; (7) Heat transfers between solid phase and liquid phase are neglected.

    Biot (1941) provided the mechanical stress equilibrium equation for existing porous pressure conditions

    (1)

    where σij is the stress tensor; bi is the body force vector.

    Teraghi's effective stress principle, which is fit to saturated media, can be expanded to unsaturated media, then

    (2)

    where σ'ij is the effective stress tensor; φ is the piezometric head, φ=h-z, h is the total hydraulic head, z is the location of the hydraulic head; ρ is fluid density; g is gravity acceleration; χ is a function of the degree of saturation, which needs to be obtained from experiments

    δij is the Kronecker delta

    When the medium is pore-elastic, the linear thermal stress theory can be applied, and the constituent equation is as follows

    (3)

    where Dijkl is the elastic compliance tensor, which is a fourth-order tensor; εij is the strain tensor; β is the thermal stress coefficient, , αt is the thermal expansion coefficient, E is medium Young's elastic module, υ is Poisson's ratio; T is current temperature; T0 is initial temperature.

    Strain definition is as follows

    (4)

    where ui is the displacement vector.

    The fluid flow equation is as follows (Bear, 1972)

    (5)

    where θ is water content; v is velocity vector of groundwater flow; ρis fluid density.Considering fluid compression or expansion, fluid density can be shown as

    (6)

    where ρ0 is the reference density of the fluid in pressure p0 and temperature T0; βT is the thermal expansivity of the fluid, ; βp is the compressibility of the fluid, , and p is pore pressure.

    If evaporation and condensation are not considered, and the heat transfer between the liquid phase and solid phase is neglected, then the heat transfer equation is (Bear and Corapcioglu, 1981; Fanst and Mercer, 1979)

    (7)

    where n is effective porosity; Sr is degree of saturation; Cv is specific heat; J is heat flux by heat conduction; f stands for liquid phase, s for solid phase; vf is velocity of liquid phase; εs is strain of solid phase; ρs is solid phase density.

    Initial conditions are

    Boundary conditions are as follows.

    Displacement

    Traction

    Hydraulic

    Flow rate

    Temperature

    Heat flow

    Heat exchange

    where T' is the water convection conduction coefficient; α is the convection heat exchange coefficient; Tb is the temperature on the boundary; Ta is the temperature in the surrounding environment.

    The Galerkin weighted residual finite element method is employed in this paper.The code is devel - oped under the assumption that it is a plane strain or an axial symmetry problem.A fully implicit mid-interval backward difference algorithm (Thomas and King, 1991) and a predictor-corrector iterative solution procedure (Volckaert et al., 1996) were employed to solve these non-linear ful-l coupled equations.

    The validation of the model and code is verified ei - ther with theoretical analysis or with experiments, which were done by the authors or other researchers. Seven examples were used to verify the model in this study, see details in Shen (1998).

    Since the disposal conception of HLW in various countries is different, the following silo-shaped disposal conception was taken in this paper (Shen and Cheng, 2002;Shen et al., 2000a).The disposal unit is an axial symmetry problem with the solidified product in the centre.Around the solidified product is a waste barrel, around the barrel is buffer material, and around the buffer material is rock.The solidified product is 430 mm in diameter and 1335 mm in height, the barrel is 1030 mm in diameter and 1935 mm in height, and the buffer material is 2230 mm in diameter and 4065 mm in height.It is also assumed that the repository is 1000 m under the surface and the distance between two disposal silos is 10 m.

    The heat source of an HLW disposal repository is actually from the decay heat of radionuclides in solidi - fied body, and so the distribution of radiation doses in and around the solidified body should be discussed (Shen et al., 2000a, b).In this paper, the dose rate at different times, both inside and outside the solidified product, is calculated by using the radionuclide inventory in the vitrified high-level waste (W1) of Belgium as the initial condition (Marivot, 1991).Then the dose rate is used as the heat source in the THM coupled model.

    It must be pointed out that the solidified product will be stored for 50 years on the surface before it is actually disposed of, so we considered this condition in our code (Table 1).

    Table  1.  Radionuclides and their activity in the solidified body (Marivot, 1991)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The silo-shape disposal system can be treated as an axis symmetry problem, and only 1/4 part of the disposal unit should be taken in the calculation.It is assumed that the HLW will be disposed 1000 m under the ground.The calculation scale: in radial direction, half of the distance between two disposal silos, that is 5 m, is taken; in vertical direction, 20 m is taken.The numerical discretion is done, and the grids are shown in Fig. 2.There are a total of 450 rectangle elements and 496 nodes.

    Figure  2.  Finite element grids.In it, from left to right in lower boundary, 1# to 16# are taken as typical points.1# is the center of the solidified product and 16# is far away from the solidified product.1# to 3# are in the solidified product, 3# to 5# are in the package, 5# to 9# are in buffer material, and 9# to 16# are in disposal medium.The typical points showed in the following figures are the same as this.

    Temperature field   The disposal repository is 1000 m subsurface, the temperature at the surface is 15℃, the local ground temperature gradient is 2.5 ℃/ 100 m, so the initial temperature at the disposal repository is 40℃.

    Hydraulic field  The buffer material is unsaturated high-compacted bentonite, the initial degree of saturation is 80%, and it is assumed that the water head in the bedrock (disposal medium) will be 800 m as soon as the disposal is completed.

    Stress field  It is assumed that the bedrock is at stress equilibrium state after the disposal is completed.

    Temperature field  The left, right and lower boundaries are heat fluxes zero boundaries, and the upper boundary is the varying fluxes boundary, which can be treated as that in Luo and Chen (1988).

    Hydraulic field  The upper and right boundaries are the stable water head boundaries; the lower and left boundaries are the zero flux boundaries.

    Stress field  The upper and lower boundaries are the zero vertical displacement boundaries, and the left and right boundaries are the zero landscape orientation displacement boundaries.

    Table 2 shows the parameters that we used in the model.The parameters of the buffer material are from experiments carried out by Shen (1998).Other parameters are from Stephansson et al.(1996), Dong (1994) and Rehbinder (1995).

    Table  2.  Parameters of the various mediums
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Figure 3 shows the temperature vs.time at several typical points (1#, 5#, 9#, 16#).It shows that the temperature in the central point (1#) of the solidified product will reach the maximum at about 10 a after waste disposal is completed (about 410 K) and then it decreases slowly over time, remaining high even after 10000 a (360 K).The varying trends of the other points in the near field are the same, except that the temperature is a little lower than that of the central point.The greater the distance from the central point, the lower the maximum temperature.

    Figure  3.  Temperature vs.time at typical points.

    A very interesting phenomenon is found in modeling, just as shown in Fig. 3, the temperature drops at some periods (0.1-1 a) of heating.We wanted to know why this phenomenon appears, and found that it does not appear if the THM coupled processes are not considered.And if the TM coupled processes only are considered, this phenomenon does not exist either.It appears to be the result of heat convection by fluid flowing.This phenomenon has been not reported by any references so far.

    But it must be pointed out that this phenomenon only appeared in this example.In this example, water expansion is caused by a rise in temperature, so the water head in the buffer material is very high and the hydraulic gradient is very large, which means the velocity of fluid is also very high.In these modeled conditions the phenomenon has appeared.In actual condi - tions the groundwater around the disposal repository will be drained before disposal.When the disposal is completed the repository will be closed; the recovery of the water level is gradual, and may take as long as 2 -5 a, so this phenomenon is unlikely to appear.

    Figure 4 shows temperature vs.radial distance at different times at the central plane.It shows that the temperature gradient in the solidified product and buffer material is much bigger, and in the package and disposal medium is much smaller.As time goes by, the temperature gradient in the near field gets smaller and smaller.

    Figure  4.  Temperature vs.radial distance at the central plane.

    Figure 5 shows temperature distribution in the buffer material in 1 d and 30 a after disposal is completed.It shows that the temperature in the buffer material is 314 K to 319 K in 1 d after disposal is completed, and 360 K to 380 K in 30 a after disposal completion.

    Figure  5.  Temperature distribution in buffer material after disposal.(a)1 d;(b)30 a.

    Figure 6 shows the hydraulic head vs.time in the buffer material.The fluid in the buffer material is unsaturated in its initial condition.Since it is assumed that the hydraulic heads in the bedrock (disposal medium) remain steady, and the hydraulic head in the solidified body and its package is zero, the hydraulic head change in the buffer material is a consolidation problem with the temperature impact.With the rising temperature, the hydraulic head can not be dissipated in time, so the hydraulic head in the buffer material changes very quickly at the beginning, reaching the maximum in about 15 d.Then the hydraulic head dissipates gradually, becoming steady in about 90 d.

    Figure  6.  Hydraulic head vs.time at typical points in buffer material (the points 1#-5# in this figure are actual 5#-9# typical points in Fig. 2).

    Figure 7 shows the radial stress vs.time in the buffer material at typical point 6#.Since the stress in this example is actually caused by thermal stress (which is caused by temperature change), and fluid pressure (which is caused by hydraulic head change), it is closely related to temperature and hydraulic head. After about 100 a, the hydraulic head is holding at 800 m and the variation in temperature is very small, so the stress hardly changes.

    Figure  7.  Radial stress vs.time at typical point 6#.

    The study of THM coupled processes is the new problem which is put forward during HLW deep geological disposal.From above, a model is presented to describe ful-l coupled THM behavior for saturated-unsturated porous media.The preliminary simulation in an assumed disposal condition is performed.The spatial distributions of temperature, water head and stress in the near field of HLW repository in different times are given out.It shows that THM coupled processes are very important in the safety analysis of an HLW deep geological disposal repository.Since THM coupled processes are very complicated, much work needs to be done to fully understand THM coupled processes in near field, even in far field with disposal medium.

  • Bear, J., 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. America Elsevier Publishing Company INC, New York
    Bear, J., Corapcioglu, M.Y., 1981. A Mathematical Model for Consolidation in a Thermoelastic Aquifer Due to Hot Injection or Pumping. Water Resour. Res., 17(3): 723 -736 doi: 10.1029/WR017i003p00723
    Biot, M.A., 1941. General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation. J. Appl. Phys., 12(155): 155-164
    Dong, W., 1994. Study on the Highly Compacted Buffer Material and the Simulation of the Transport of Heat and Mass in the Near Field of HLW Disposal Repository: [Dissertation ]. Tsinghua University, Beijing (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Fanst, C.R., Mercer, J.W., 1979. Geothermal Reservoir Simulation1. Mathematical Models for Liquid-and VaporDominated Hydro-Thermal Systems. Water Resour. Res., 15(1): 23-30
    Jing, L., Tsang, C.F., Stephansson, O., 1995. DECOVALEX-An International Cooperative Research Project on Mathematical Models of Coupled T-H-M Process for Safety Analysis of Radioactive Waste Repositories. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 32 (5): 389-398
    Luo, H.Y., Chen, Y.S., 1988. Numerical Modeling of Groundwater Movements. China Building Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
    Marivot, J., 1991. Updating of the Performance Assessments of the Geological Disposal of High-Level and Medium-Level Wastes in the BOOM Clay Formation. SCK/CEN BLG 634, 2-16
    Rrhbinder, R., 1995. Analytical Solutions of Stationary Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Problems. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 32(5): 453- 463
    Shen, Z.Y., Li, G.D., Li, S.S., 1997. Introduction of Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Coupled Processes in Buffer Material. Geological Science and Technology Information, 16(2): 79-83(in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Shen, Z.Y., 1998. Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Coupled Processes Study of Highly Compacted Buffer Materials in Near Field of a High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Repository: [Dissertation]. Tsinghua University, Beijing (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Shen, Z.Y., Li, G.D., Li, S.S., 2000a. Coupled Calculation of Dose Rate and Temperature in the Near Field of a High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Repository. Radiation Protection, 20(3): 153-158(in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Shen, Z.Y., Yang, Z.F., Li, G.D., et al., 2000b. Coupled Calculation of Dose Field-Temperature Field-HydroPotential Field-Stress Field Near HLW Deep Geological Disposal Repository. Earth Science- Journal of China University of Geosciences, 25(5): 514-517 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Shen, Z.Y., Cheng, J.R., 2002. Environmental Problems Concerning HLW Disposal Repositories. Geological Bulletin of China, 21(3): 163-165(in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Stephansson, O., Jing, L., Tsang, C.F., 1996 Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Processes of Fractured Media. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 79. Elsevier Science Publish B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Thomas, H.R., King, S.D., 1991. Coupled Temperature/ Capillary Potential Variations in Unsaturated Soil. ASCE, J. Eng. Mech., 117(11): 2475-2491 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:11(2475)
    Volckaert, G., Bernier, F., Alonso, E., et al., 1996. Therma-l Hydraulic-Mechanical and Geochemical Behavior of the Clay Barrier in Radioactive Waste Repositories. CEC Reports, EUR 16744 EN, Luxembourg
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Jiefei Zhang, Shu Zhang, Huiming Tang, Qingbing Liu, Qiang Li, Huan Zhang. Creeping reservoir landslide progressive evolution process: from large-scale direct shear creep test to seepage-mechanical-deformation block model[J]. Journal of Earth Science. doi: 10.1007/s12583-025-0215-4
    [2]Yi-Xiang Wang, Xiao-Pei Guo, Ling Xu, Shi-Feng Lu. How do Notch Shape and Boundary Conditions Affect the Hydro-Mechanical Behavior of Fractured Geomaterials? Findings via the Darcy-Brinkman-Biot Approach[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2025, 36(1): 351-356. doi: 10.1007/s12583-024-0148-3
    [3]Yuqiang Li, Xiaoping Yuan. Coupled Surface Process and Orographic Precipitation Model for the Landscape Evolution of the Himalayas[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2024, 35(3): 1063-1068. doi: 10.1007/s12583-024-2012-x
    [4]Yu Ye, Joseph R. Smyth, Guangchen Chen. Hydration Effect on Equations of State for Minerals in the Peridotite System: Implication for Geotherms in the Mantle[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2022, 33(5): 1124-1144. doi: 10.1007/s12583-022-1712-3
    [5]Wengang He. Influence of Mechanical Stratigraphy on the Deformation Evolution of Fold-Thrust Belts: Insights from the Analogue Modeling of Eastern Sichuan-Western Hunan and Hubei, South China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2020, 31(4): 795-807. doi: 10.1007/s12583-020-1281-2
    [6]Yang Tuoxin, Huangfu Pengpeng, Zhang Yan. Differentiation of Continental Subduction Mode: Numerical Modeling[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2019, 30(4): 809-822. doi: 10.1007/s12583-017-0946-y
    [7]Jiafa Zhang, Jinlong Wang, Haodong Cui. Causes of the abnormal seepage field in a dam with asphaltic concrete core[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2016, 27(1): 74-82. doi: 10.1007/s12583-016-0623-6
    [8]Satoru Tanaka. One-Dimensional Modeling of Multiple Scattering in the Upper Inner Core: Depth Extent of a Scattering Region in the Eastern Hemisphere[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(5). doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0366-6
    [9]Jingtian Tang, Feiyan Wang, Xiao Xiao, Lincheng Zhang. 2.5-D DC Resistivity Modeling Considering Flexibility and Accuracy[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2011, 22(1): 124-130. doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0163-z
    [10]Ugur Yaramanci, Mike Müller-Petke. Improvements in Inversion of Magnetic Resonance Exploration—Water Content, Decay Time, and Resistivity[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2009, 20(3): 592-605. doi: 10.1007/s12583-009-0049-5
    [11]Jianning Yu, Huayao Zou, Zaisheng Gong. Preferential Petroleum Migration Pathways in Eastern Pearl River Mouth Basin, Offshore South China Sea[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2009, 20(4): 720-730. doi: 10.1007/s12583-009-0062-8
    [12]Zhijing Wang, Qiuming Cheng, Deyi Xu, Yaosong Dong. Fractal Modeling of Sphalerite Banding in Jinding Pb-Zn Deposit, Yunnan, Southwestern China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2008, 19(1): 77-84.
    [13]Ling-qing YAO, Mao PAN, Qiu-ming CHENG. 3D Property Modeling of Void Ratio by Cokriging[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2008, 19(4): 410-415.
    [14]Yao Luo, Changli Yao. Forward Modeling of Gravity, Gravity Gradients, and Magnetic Anomalies due to Complex Bodies[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2007, 18(3): 280-286.
    [15]Shu-hai LIN, Li-ying ZHAO. High Precision Time Domain Forward Modeling for Crosshole Electromagnetic Tomography[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2007, 18(4): 320-325.
    [16]Baochun ZHOU, Jingtao WANG, Jun WEI. Method of Numerical Modeling for Constitutive Relations of Clay[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2006, 17(4): 355-360.
    [17]Yan Luo, Yongsheng Liu, Shenghong Hu, Shan Gao, Shoulin Lin. Trace Elements Analysis of Geological Samples by Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2001, 12(3): 236-239.
    [18]Delie Ming, Kefei You, Jinwen Tian, Jian Liu, Guangjun Wang. Terrain Simplification Research in Augmented Scene Modeling[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2001, 12(4): 351-355.
    [19]Zhen Sun, Di Zhou, Zuoxun Zeng, Zhihong Zhong, Wei Tian. Dynamic Analysis of Yinggehai Basin through Analogue Modeling[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2000, 11(1): 79-83.
    [20]Shujie Han, Qiuming Cheng. GIS-Based Hydrogeological-Parameter Modeling[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2000, 11(2): 131-133.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 45.3 %FULLTEXT: 45.3 %META: 54.4 %META: 54.4 %PDF: 0.3 %PDF: 0.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 1.6 %其他: 1.6 %China: 66.1 %China: 66.1 %Finland: 0.5 %Finland: 0.5 %Korea Republic of: 2.3 %Korea Republic of: 2.3 %Reserved: 4.2 %Reserved: 4.2 %Russian Federation: 5.7 %Russian Federation: 5.7 %United States: 19.5 %United States: 19.5 %其他ChinaFinlandKorea Republic ofReservedRussian FederationUnited States

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(511) PDF downloads(24) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return