Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Volume 22 Issue 3
Jun.  2011
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

杜时贵, 胡云进, 胡晓飞, 郭霄. Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength. Journal of Earth Science, 2011, 22(3). doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6
Citation: 杜时贵, 胡云进, 胡晓飞, 郭霄. Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength. Journal of Earth Science, 2011, 22(3). doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6

Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength

doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6
  • Received Date: 2018-07-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-07-15
  • Publish Date: 2018-07-15
  • In order to study the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC (joint roughness coefficient)-JCS (joint compressive strength) model, natural rock joints of different lithologic characteristics and different sizes were selected as samples, and their shear strengths under dry and saturated conditions were measured by direct shear test and compared to those estimated by the JRC-JCS model. Comparison results show that for natural rock joints with joint surfaces closely matched, the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 9.9%; the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is good under both dry and saturated conditions if the JRC is determined accounting for direc-tional statistical measurements, scale effect and surface smoothing during shearing...
  • 加载中
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(420) PDF downloads(35) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength

doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6

Abstract: In order to study the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC (joint roughness coefficient)-JCS (joint compressive strength) model, natural rock joints of different lithologic characteristics and different sizes were selected as samples, and their shear strengths under dry and saturated conditions were measured by direct shear test and compared to those estimated by the JRC-JCS model. Comparison results show that for natural rock joints with joint surfaces closely matched, the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 9.9%; the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is good under both dry and saturated conditions if the JRC is determined accounting for direc-tional statistical measurements, scale effect and surface smoothing during shearing...

杜时贵, 胡云进, 胡晓飞, 郭霄. Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength. Journal of Earth Science, 2011, 22(3). doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6
Citation: 杜时贵, 胡云进, 胡晓飞, 郭霄. Comparison between Empirical Estimation by JRC-JCS Model and Direct Shear Test for Joint Shear Strength. Journal of Earth Science, 2011, 22(3). doi: 10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return