Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Volume 32 Issue 5
Oct 2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jian Chen, Hideyuki O-tani, Tomohide Takeyama, Satoru Oishi, Hori Muneo Hori. A Probabilistic Liquefaction Hazard Assessment for Urban Regions Based on Dynamics Analysis Considering Soil Uncertainties. Journal of Earth Science, 2021, 32(5): 1129-1138. doi: 10.1007/s12583-021-1431-1
Citation: Jian Chen, Hideyuki O-tani, Tomohide Takeyama, Satoru Oishi, Hori Muneo Hori. A Probabilistic Liquefaction Hazard Assessment for Urban Regions Based on Dynamics Analysis Considering Soil Uncertainties. Journal of Earth Science, 2021, 32(5): 1129-1138. doi: 10.1007/s12583-021-1431-1

A Probabilistic Liquefaction Hazard Assessment for Urban Regions Based on Dynamics Analysis Considering Soil Uncertainties

doi: 10.1007/s12583-021-1431-1
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Jian Chen, jchen@jamstec.go.jp
  • Received Date: 04 Dec 2020
  • Accepted Date: 03 Feb 2021
  • Publish Date: 01 Oct 2021
  • Earthquake induced liquefaction is one of the main geo-disasters threating urban regions, which not only causes direct damages to buildings, but also delays both real-time disaster relief actions and reconstruction activities. It is thus important to assess liquefaction hazard of urban regions effectively and efficiently for disaster prevention and mitigation. Conventional assessment approaches rely on engineering indices such as the factor of safety (FS) against liquefaction, which cannot take into account directly the uncertainties of soils. In contrast, a physics simulation-based approach, by solving soil dynamics problems coupled with excess pore water pressure (EPWP) it is possible to model the uncertainties directly via Monte Carlo simulations. In this study, we demonstrate the capability of such an approach for assessing an urban region with over 10 000 sites. The permeability parameters are assumed to follow a base-10-lognormal distribution among 100 model analyses for each site. A dynamic simulation is conducted for each model analysis to obtain the EPWP results. Based on over 1 million EPWP analysis models, we obtained a probabilistic liquefaction assessment. Empowered by high performance computing, we present for the first time a probabilistic liquefaction hazard assessment for urban regions based on dynamics analysis, which consider soil uncertainties.

     

  • loading
  • Bi, C. K., Fu, B. R., Chen, J., et al., 2019. Machine Learning Based Fast Multi-Layer Liquefaction Disaster Assessment. World Wide Web, 22(5): 1935-1950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-018-0632-8
    Chen, J., Takeyama, T., O-Tani, H., et al., 2020. Code Verification of Soil Dynamics Simulations: A Case Study Using the Method of Numerically Manufactured Solutions. Computers and Geotechnics, 117: 103258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103258
    Chen, J., Hori, M., O-Tani, H., et al., 2017. Proposal of Method of Numerically Manufactured Solutions for Code Verification of Elasto-Plastic Problems. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser A2 (Applied Mechanics (AM)), 73(2): I165-I175. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejam.73.i_165
    Chen, J., O-Tani, H., de Takeyama, T., et al., 2019a. Toward a Numerical-Simulation-Based Liquefaction Hazard Assessment for Urban Regions Using High-Performance Computing. Engineering Geology, 258: 105153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105153
    Chen, J., Takeyama, T., O-Tani, H., et al., 2019b. Using High Performance Computing for Liquefaction Hazard Assessment with Statistical Soil Models. International Journal of Computational Methods, 16(5): 1840005. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219876218400054
    Chen, J., Takeyama, T., O-Tani, H., et al., 2016. A Framework for Assessing Liquefaction Hazard for Urban Areas Based on Soil Dynamics. International Journal of Computational Methods, 13(4): 1641011. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219876216410115
    Chen, L. W., Yuan, X. M., Cao, Z. Z., et al., 2009. Liquefaction Macrophenomena in the Great Wenchuan Earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 8(2): 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-9033-4
    Cubrinovski, M., Henderson, D., Bradley, B., 2012. Liquefaction Impacts in Residential Areas in the 2010-2011 Christchurch Earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. March 1-4, 2012. Tokyo. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/6712
    Daniell, J. E., Khazai, B., Wenzel, F., et al., 2012. The Worldwide Economic Impact of Earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering. September 24-28, 2012. Lisbon
    Fu, S. C., Tatsuoka, F., 1984. Soil Liquefaction during Haicheng and Tangshan Earthquake in China: A Review. Soils and Foundations, 24(4): 11-29. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.24.4_11
    He, Z. T., Ma, B. Q., Long, J. Y., et al., 2018. New Progress in Paleoearthquake Studies of the East Sertengshan Piedmont Fault, Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Earth Science, 29(2): 441-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-017-0937-z
    Huang, Y., Jiang, X. M., 2010. Field-Observed Phenomena of Seismic Liquefaction and Subsidence during the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake in China. Natural Hazards, 54(3): 839-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9509-6
    Huang, Y., Xiong, M., Zhou, H. B., 2015. Ground Seismic Response Analysis Based on the Probability Density Evolution Method. Engineering Geology, 198: 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.09.004
    Huang, Y., Yashima, A., Sawada, K., et al., 2008. Numerical Assessment of the Seismic Response of an Earth Embankment on Liquefiable Soils. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 67(1): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-007-0097-y
    Ishihara, K., 1996. Soil Behaviors in Earthquake Geotechnics. Oxford Science Publication, Oxford
    JGS (The Japanese Geotechnical Society), 2011. Soil Liquefaction Survey in Kanto District during the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Technical Report to Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Kanto Regional Development Bureau (in Japanese)
    JMA (Japan Meteorological Agency), 1997. Report on the Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake, 1995, Japan Meteorological Agency Technical Report, No. 119
    JRA (Japan Road Association), 2012. Part V, Seismic Design, Specifications for Highway Bridges (in Japanese)
    Juang, C. H., Ching, J., Luo, Z., 2013. Assessing SPT-Based Probabilistic Models for Liquefaction Potential Evaluation: A 10-Year Update. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 7(3): 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.778117
    Kang, G. C., Chung, J. W., Rogers, J. D., 2014. Re-Calibrating the Thresholds for the Classification of Liquefaction Potential Index Based on the 2004 Niigata-Ken Chuetsu Earthquake. Engineering Geology, 169: 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.012
    Kitagawa, Y., Hiraishi, H., 2004. Overview of the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake and Proposals for Earthquake Mitigation Measures. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 4(3): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.5610/jaee.4.3_1
    Knappett, J. A., Craig, R. F., 2012. Craig's Soil Mechanics, Spon Press, London
    Kobe-JIBANKUN Steering Committee, 2020. The Functionality of the Web Version of Kobe JIBANKUN, http://www.strata.jp/KobeJibankun/about.htm (in Japanese, Accessed November 25, 2020)
    Koyama, T., 2018. Chapter 8——Liquefaction with the Great East Japan Earthquake. In: Faculty of Societal Safety Sciences, Kansai University, eds., The Fukushima and Tohoku Disaster: A Review of the Five-Year Reconstruction Efforts. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn. 147-159
    Kramer, S., 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
    Liu, X. F., Zheng, L. J., Jiang, Z. X., et al., 2017. Formation Mechanisms of Rudstones and Their Effects on Reservoir Quality in the Shulu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China. Journal of Earth Science, 28(6): 1097-1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-016-0944-5
    Ma, S. Y., Xu, C., 2019. Applicability of Two Newmark Models in the Assessment of Coseismic Landslide Hazard and Estimation of Slope-Failure Probability: An Example of the 2008 Wenchuan Mw7.9 Earthquake Affected Area. Journal of Earth Science, 30(5): 1020-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-019-0874-0
    Manzari, M. T., Ghoraiby, M. E., Kutter, B. L., et al., 2018. Liquefaction Experiment and Analysis Projects (LEAP): Summary of Observations from the Planning Phase. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 113: 714-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.015
    Maurer, B. W., Green, R. A., Taylor, O. D. S., 2015. Moving towards an Improved Index for Assessing Liquefaction Hazard: Lessons from Historical Data. Soils and Foundations, 55(4): 778-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.010
    Narumi, T., Kameoka, S., Taiji, M., et al., 2008. Accelerating Molecular Dynamics Simulations on PlayStation 3 Platform Using Virtual-GRAPE Programming Model. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 30(6): 3108-3125. https://doi.org/10.1137/070692054
    Poulos, S. J., Castro, G., France, J. W., 1985. Liquefaction Evaluation Procedure. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 111(6): 772-792. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1985)111:6(772)
    Promotion Committee on Database of Strong Motion Array Observation, 1998. Tech. Rep. 3, Association for Earthquake Prevention, Tokyo (in Japanese)
    Seed, H. B., 1968. Landslides During Earthquakes Due to Soil Liquefaction. Terzaghi Lectures, 1963-1972: 191-261
    Seed, R. B., Cetin, K. O., Moss, R. E. S., et al., 2003. Recent Advances in Soil Liquefaction Engineering: A Unified and Consistent Framework. In: 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar
    Shibata, T., Oka, F., Ozawa, Y., 1996. Characteristics of Ground Deformation Due to Liquefaction. Soils and Foundations, 36(Special): 65-79. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.special_65
    Takeyama, T., Tachibana, S., Furukawa, A., 2014. A Finite Element Method to Describe the Cyclic Behavior of Saturated Soil. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 255-260. October 25-26, 2014. Zurich
    Wakamatsu, K., 2012. Recurrent Liquefaction Induced by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 12(5): 569-588. https://doi.org/10.5610/jaee.12.5_69
    Wu, J., Kammerer, A. M., Riemer, M. F., et al., 2004. Laboratory Study of Liquefaction Triggering Criteria. In: Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, No. 2580
    Ye, B., Ye, G. L., Zhang, F., et al., 2007. Experiment and Numerical Simulation of Repeated Liquefaction-Consolidation of Sand. Soils and Foundations, 47(3): 547-558. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.547
    Yoshida, N., Sawada, S., Nakamura, S., 2008. Simplified Method in Evaluating Liquefaction Occurrence Against Huge Ocean Trench Earthquake. In: Proceedings of 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Beijing
    Youd, T. L., Idriss, I. M., Andrus, R. D., et al., 2001. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(10): 817-833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817)
    Zhao, L. Y., Huang Y., 2020. Advances in Stochastic Dynamic Analysis of Slopes under Earthquakes. Journal of Engineering Geology, 28(3): 584-596 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Zhou, Y. G., Xia, P., Ling, D. S., et al., 2020. Liquefaction Case Studies of Gravelly Soils during the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. Engineering Geology, 274:105691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105691
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(375) PDF downloads(26) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return