Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Volume 37 Issue 1
Feb 2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhiyu Gao, Yanchuan Li, Xinjian Shan, Chuanchao Huang, Xing Huang, Kai Zheng, Bo Li. Quick Prediction of Earthquake Ground Shaking Intensity Using High-Rate GNSS: A Case Study of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Maduo Earthquake. Journal of Earth Science, 2026, 37(1): 351-360. doi: 10.1007/s12583-023-1854-y
Citation: Zhiyu Gao, Yanchuan Li, Xinjian Shan, Chuanchao Huang, Xing Huang, Kai Zheng, Bo Li. Quick Prediction of Earthquake Ground Shaking Intensity Using High-Rate GNSS: A Case Study of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Maduo Earthquake. Journal of Earth Science, 2026, 37(1): 351-360. doi: 10.1007/s12583-023-1854-y

Quick Prediction of Earthquake Ground Shaking Intensity Using High-Rate GNSS: A Case Study of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Maduo Earthquake

doi: 10.1007/s12583-023-1854-y
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Yanchuan Li, yanchuan@ies.ac.cn
  • Received Date: 21 Mar 2023
  • Accepted Date: 16 May 2023
  • Available Online: 13 Feb 2026
  • Issue Publish Date: 28 Feb 2026
  • Seismic intensity is critical for post-earthquake hazard assessment and response, but is often delayed because field surveys are required. Here, we propose a simple scheme for quick prediction of earthquake ground shaking intensity using high-rate Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data. In the scheme, high-rate GNSS displacement waveforms and static GNSS coseismic offsets are first used to invert the fault rupture process based on a one-fault model. The kinematic slip model is then employed as input for kinematic forward simulation to predict strong ground motion, which is subsequently convert into seismic intensities according to the China seismic intensity scale (GB/T 17742–2020). We take the 2021 Mw 7.3 Maduo Earthquake as a case study to illustrate the feasibility of this scheme. Our results show that the seismic intensity produced by the one-fault model is consistent with that from field investigations, especially in meizoseismal zones, suggesting that the scheme may serve as a potential solution for quick prediction of seismic intensity, which helps to disaster relief efforts after strong earthquakes.

     

  • Electronic Supplementary Materials: Supplementary materials (Texts S1–S2, Figures S1–S4) are available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-023-1854-y.
    Conflict of Interest
    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
  • loading
  • Allen, R. M., Kanamori, H., 2003. The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Southern California. Science, 300(5620): 786–789. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080912
    An, Y. R., Wang, D., Ma, Q., et al., 2023. Preliminary Report of the September 5, 2022 MS 6.8 Luding Earthquake, Sichuan, China. Earthquake Research Advances, 3(1): 100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqrea.2022.100184
    Chen, H., Qu, C. Y., Zhao, D. Z., et al., 2021. Rupture Kinematics and Coseismic Slip Model of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Maduo (China) Earthquake: Implications for the Seismic Hazard of the Kunlun Fault. Remote Sensing, 13(16): 3327. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163327
    Chen, K. J., Avouac, J. P., Geng, J. H., et al., 2022. The 2021 Mw 7.4 Madoi Earthquake: An Archetype Bilateral Slip-Pulse Rupture Arrested at a Splay Fault. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(2): e2021GL095243. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095243
    Chen, W. K., Rao, G., Kang, D. J., et al., 2023. Early Report of the Source Characteristics, Ground Motions, and Casualty Estimates of the 2023 Mw 7.8 and 7.5 Turkey Earthquakes. Journal of Earth Science, 34(2): 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-023-1316-6
    Chen, W. K., Wang, D., Si, H. J., et al., 2022a. Rapid Estimation of Seismic Intensities Using a New Algorithm that Incorporates Array Technologies and Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 112(3): 1647–1661. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210207
    Chen, W. K., Wang, D., Zhang, C., et al., 2022b. Estimating Seismic Intensity Maps of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Madoi, Qinghai and Mw 6.1 Yangbi, Yunnan, China Earthquakes. Journal of Earth Science, 33(4): 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-021-1586-9
    Cheng, C., Wang, D., Yao, Q., et al., 2023. The 2021 Mw 7.3 Madoi, China Earthquake: Transient Supershear Ruptures on a Presumed Immature Strike-Slip Fault. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 128(2): e2022JB024641. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024641
    Crowell, B. W., 2021. Near-Field Strong Ground Motions from GPS-Derived Velocities for 2020 Intermountain Western United States Earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 92(2A): 840–848. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200325
    Crowell, B. W., Schmidt, D. A., Bodin, P., et al., 2018. G-FAST Earthquake Early Warning Potential for Great Earthquakes in Chile. Seismological Research Letters, 89(2A): 542–556. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170180
    Ding, K. H., Wang, Q., Li, Z. C., et al., 2022. Rapid Source Determination of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake by a Dense High-Rate GNSS Network in the Tibetan Plateau. Seismological Research Letters, 93(6): 3234–3245. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210307
    Fang, R. X., Zheng, J. W., Geng, J. H., et al., 2021. Earthquake Magnitude Scaling Using Peak Ground Velocity Derived from High-Rate GNSS Observations. Seismological Research Letters, 92(1): 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190347
    Gao, Z. Y., Li, Y. C., Shan, X. J., et al., 2021. Earthquake Magnitude Estimation from High-Rate GNSS Data: A Case Study of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Maduo Earthquake. Remote Sensing, 13(21): 4478. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214478
    Gao, Z. Y., Li, Y. C., Shan, X. J., et al., 2022. Testing a Prototype Earthquake Early Warning System: A Retrospective Study of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, Tibet, Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters, 93(3): 1650–1659. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210245
    Geng, J. H., Pan, Y. X., Li, X. T., et al., 2018. Noise Characteristics of High-Rate Multi-GNSS for Subdaily Crustal Deformation Monitoring. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(2): 1987–2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018JB015527
    Guo, R. M., Yang, H. F., Li, Y., et al., 2022. Complex Slip Distribution of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, China, Earthquake: An Event Occurring on the Slowly Slipping Fault. Seismological Research Letters, 93(2A): 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210226
    Ha, G. H., Liu, J. R., Ren, Z. K., et al., 2022. The Interpretation of Seismogenic Fault of the Maduo Mw 7.3 Earthquake, Qinghai Based on Remote Sensing Images—A Branch of the East Kunlun Fault System. Journal of Earth Science, 33(4): 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-021-1556-2
    Harris, R. A., 2004. Numerical Simulations of Large Earthquakes: Dynamic Rupture Propagation on Heterogeneous Faults. In: Donnellan, A., Mora, P., Matsu'ura, M., et al., eds., Computational Earthquake Science Part Ⅱ. Birkhäuser Basel, Basel. 2171–2181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7875-3_5
    Harris, R. A., Barall, M., Aagaard, B., et al., 2018. A Suite of Exercises for Verifying Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Codes. Seismological Research Letters, 89(3): 1146–1162. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170222
    He, K. F., Wen, Y. M., Xu, C. J., et al., 2022. Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, China, Earthquake Inferred from InSAR Measurements and Relocated Aftershocks. Seismological Research Letters, 93(1): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210204
    He, L. J., Feng, G. C., Wu, X. X., et al., 2021. Coseismic and Early Postseismic Slip Models of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake (Western China) Estimated by Space-Based Geodetic Data. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(24): e2021GL095860. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095860
    Huang, X. L., Peng, Y. Y., Cheng, C., et al., 2022. Determination and Comparison of ML, MS_BB, mB, MWp, MWW, Mdt, and M (GNSS) for the 22 May 2021 M 7.4 Madoi, Qinghai, China Earthquake. Journal of Earth Science, 33(4): 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-022-1680-7
    Jin, Z. Y., Fialko, Y., 2021. Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation Due to the 2021 M7.4 Maduo (China) Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(21): e2021GL095213. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095213
    Kanamori, H., 1977. The Energy Release in Great Earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research (1896–1977), 82(20): 2981–2987. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB082i020p02981
    Li, Z. C., Ding, K. H., Zhang, P., et al., 2021. Coseismic Deformation and Slip Distribution of 2021 Mw 7.4 Madoi Earthquake from GNSS Observation. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 46(10): 1489–1497. https://doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20210301 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Lyu, M. Z., Chen, K. J., Chai, H. S., et al., 2022a. Joint Inversion of InSAR and High-Rate GNSS Displacement Waveforms for the Rupture Process of the 2022 Qinghai Menyuan M 6.9 Earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 65(12): 4725–4738. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2022Q0304 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
    Lyu, M. Z., Chen, K. J., Xue, C. H., et al., 2022b. Overall Subshear but Locally Supershear Rupture of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake from High-Rate GNSS Waveforms and Three-Dimensional InSAR Deformation. Tectonophysics, 839: 229542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229542
    Melgar, D., Bock, Y., 2015. Kinematic Earthquake Source Inversion and Tsunami Runup Prediction with Regional Geophysical Data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120(5): 3324–3349. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011832
    Melgar, D., Crowell, B. W., Melbourne, T. I., et al., 2020. Noise Characteristics of Operational Real-Time High-Rate GNSS Positions in a Large Aperture Network. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(7): e2019JB019197. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB019197
    Melgar, D., LeVeque, R. J., Dreger, D. S., et al., 2016. Kinematic Rupture Scenarios and Synthetic Displacement Data: An Example Application to the Cascadia Subduction Zone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(9): 6658–6674. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013314
    Olson, E. L., Allen, R. M., 2005. The Deterministic Nature of Earthquake Rupture. Nature, 438(7065): 212–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04214
    Pan, J. W., Li, H. B., Chevalier, M. L., et al., 2022. Co-Seismic Rupture of the 2021, Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake (Northern Tibet): Short-Cutting of the Kunlun Fault Big Bend. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 594: 117703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117703
    Peng, C. Y., Yang, J. S., Zheng, Y., et al., 2017. New τc Regression Relationship Derived from All P Wave Time Windows for Rapid Magnitude Estimation. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(4): 1724–1731. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071672
    Ruhl, C. J., Melgar, D., Grapenthin, R., et al., 2017. The Value of Real-Time GNSS to Earthquake Early Warning. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(16): 8311–8319. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074502
    Shan, X. J., Li, Y. C., Wang, Z. J., et al., 2021. GNSS for Quasi-Real-Time Earthquake Source Determination in Eastern Tibet: A Prototype System Toward Early Warning Applications. Seismological Research Letters, 92(5): 2988–2997. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190244
    Tao, Y., Liu, C., Liu, C. Y., et al., 2021. Empirical Wavelet Transform Method for GNSS Coordinate Series Denoising. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 5(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-021-00078-7
    Wang, M., Wang, F., Jiang, X., et al., 2022. GPS Determined Coseismic Slip of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, China, Earthquake and Its Tectonic Implication. Geophysical Journal International, 228(3): 2048–2055. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab460
    Wang, W. L., Fang, L. H., Wu, J. P., et al., 2021. Aftershock Sequence Relocation of the 2021 Ms 7.4 Maduo Earthquake, Qinghai, China. Science China Earth Sciences, 64(8): 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-021-9803-3
    Wei, G. G., Chen, K. J., Zou, R., et al., 2022. On the Potential of Rapid Moment Magnitude Estimation for Strong Earthquakes in Sichuan-Yunnan Region, China, Using Real-Time CMONOC GNSS Observations. Seismological Research Letters, 93(5): 2659–2669. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210210
    Wells, D. L., Coppersmith, K. J., 1994. New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4): 974–1002. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0840040974
    Wessel, P., Smith, W. H. F., Scharroo, R., et al., 2013. Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 94(45): 409–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001
    Xiao, L. H., Zheng, R., Zou, R., 2022. Coseismic Slip Distribution of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, Qinghai Earthquake Estimated from InSAR and GPS Measurements. Journal of Earth Science, 33(4): 885–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-022-1637-x
    Xiong, W., Chen, W., Wang, D. Z., et al., 2022. Coseismic Slip and Early Afterslip of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, China Earthquake Constrained by GPS and InSAR Data. Tectonophysics, 840: 229558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229558
    Yao, S. L., Yang, H. F., 2023. Towards Ground Motion Prediction for Potential Large Earthquakes from Interseismic Locking Models. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 601: 117905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117905
    Yu, H. Y., Hu, F., Xu, J. K., et al., 2022. Dynamic Rupture Simulation of the 1833 Songming, Yunnan, China, M 8.0 Earthquake: Effects from Stepover Location and Overlap Distance. Earth and Space Science, 9(2): e2021EA002100. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002100
    Yuan, Z. D., Li, T., Su, P., et al., 2022. Large Surface-Rupture Gaps and Low Surface Fault Slip of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake along a Low-Activity Strike-Slip Fault, Tibetan Plateau. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(6): e2021GL096874. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL096874
    Yue, H., Shen, Z. K., Zhao, Z. Y., et al., 2022. Rupture Process of the 2021 M 7.4 Maduo Earthquake and Implication for Deformation Mode of the Songpan-Ganzi Terrane in Tibetan Plateau. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(23): e2116445119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116445119
    Zang, J. F., Wen, Y. M., Li, Z. C., et al., 2022b. Rapid Source Models of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, China, Earthquake Inferred from High-Rate BDS3/2, GPS, Galileo and GLONASS Observations. Journal of Geodesy, 96(9): 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01641-w
    Zang, J. F., Xu, C. J., Li, X. X., 2020. Scaling Earthquake Magnitude in Real Time with High-Rate GNSS Peak Ground Displacement from Variometric Approach. GPS Solutions, 24(4): 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01013-x
    Zang, J. F., Xu, C. J., Wen, Y. M., et al., 2022a. Rapid Earthquake Source Description Using Variometric-Derived GPS Displacements Toward Application to the 2019 Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters, 93(1): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210129
    Zhang, X., Feng, W. P., Du, H. L., et al., 2022. Supershear Rupture during the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, China, Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(6): e2022GL097984. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL097984
    Zhao, D. Z., Qu, C. Y., Chen, H., et al., 2021. Tectonic and Geometric Control on Fault Kinematics of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Maduo (China) Earthquake Inferred from Interseismic, Coseismic, and Postseismic InSAR Observations. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(18): e2021GL095417. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095417
    Zheng, K., Liu, K. Z., Zhang, X. H., et al., 2022. First Results Using High-Rate BDS-3 Observations: Retrospective Real-Time Analysis of 2021 Mw 7.4 Madoi (Tibet) Earthquake. Journal of Geodesy, 96(8): 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01639-4
    Zhu, L. P., Rivera, L. A., 2002. A Note on the Dynamic and Static Displacements from a Point Source in Multilayered Media. Geophysical Journal International, 148(3): 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01610.x
    Zollo, A., Lancieri, M., Nielsen, S., 2006. Earthquake Magnitude Estimation from Peak Amplitudes of Very Early Seismic Signals on Strong Motion Records. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(23): L23312. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027795
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(27) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return