Advanced Search

Indexed by SCI、CA、РЖ、PA、CSA、ZR、etc .

Volume 12 Issue 1
Mar 2001
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Donald A Singer. Some Suggested Future Directions of Quantitative Resource Assessments. Journal of Earth Science, 2001, 12(1): 40-44.
Citation: Donald A Singer. Some Suggested Future Directions of Quantitative Resource Assessments. Journal of Earth Science, 2001, 12(1): 40-44.

Some Suggested Future Directions of Quantitative Resource Assessments

Funds:

USGS Research 

  • Received Date: 15 Feb 2001
  • Accepted Date: 27 Feb 2001
  • Future quantitative assessments will be expected to estimate quantities, values, and locations of undiscovered mineral resources in a form that conveys both economic viability and uncertainty associated with the resources. Historically, declining metal prices point to the need for larger deposits over time. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the greatest opportunity for reducing uncertainty in assessments lies in lowering uncertainty associated with tonnage estimates. Of all errors possible in assessments, these affecting tonnage estimates are by far the most important. Selecting the correct deposit model is the most important way of controlling errors because of the dominance of tonnage-deposit models are the best known predictors of tonnage. Much of the surface is covered with apparently barren rocks and sediments in many large regions. Because many exposed mineral deposits are believed to have been found, a prime concern is the presence of possible mineralized rock under cover. Assessments of areas with resources under cover must rely on extrapolation from surrounding areas, new geologic maps of rocks under cover, or analogy with other well-explored areas that can be considered training tracts. Cover has a profound effect on uncertainty and on methods and procedures of assessments because geology is seldom known and geophysical methods typically have attenuated responses. Many earlier assessment methods were based on relationships of geochemical and geophysical variables to deposits learned from deposits exposed on the surface-these will need to be relearned based on covered deposits. Mineral-deposit models are important in quantitative resource assessments for two reasons: (1) grades and tonnages of most deposit types are significantly different, and (2) deposit types are present in different geologic settings that can be identified from geologic maps. Mineral-deposit models are the keystone in combining the diverse geoscience information on geology, mineral occurrences, geophysics, and geochemistry used in resource assessments and mineral exploration. Grade and tonnage models and development of quantitative descriptive, economic, and deposit density models will help reduce the uncertainty of these new assessments.

     

  • loading
  • Allais M, 1957. Method of Appraising Economic Prospects of Mining Exploration over Large Territories: Algerian Sahara Case Study. Management Science, 3(4): 285-347 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.3.4.285
    Berger B R, Drew LJ, Singer D A, 1999. Quantifying Mineral-Deposit Models for Resource Assessment. In: do L, Korpas L, McCammon R B, Hofstra A H, eds. Deposit Modeling and Mining-Induced Environmental Risks. Geologica Hungarica Series Geologica, 24: 41-54
    Bliss J D, 1992. Developments in Mineral Deposit Modeling. US Geological Survey Bulletin 2004, 168
    Bliss J D, Menzie W D, 1993. Spatial Mineral-Deposit Models and the Prediction of Undiscovered Mineral Deposits. In: Kirkham R V, Sinclair R V, Thorpe W D, Duke J M, eds. Mineral Deposit Modeling. Geological Association Canada Special Paper 40, 693-706
    Cox DP, Singer D A, 1986. Mineral Deposit Models. US Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, 379
    Singer D A, 1995. World Class Base and Precious Metal Deposits-A Quantitative Analysis. Economic Geology, 90(1): 88-104 doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.90.1.88
    Singer D A, Berger V, 2001. Deposit Models and Their Application in Mineral Resource Assessments. In: Schulz K, ed. Methods for Global Mineral Resource Assessment, Chapter x. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1640, 20 (in Press)
    Singer D A, Kouda R, 1999. Examining Risk in Mineral Exploration. Natural Resources Re search, 8(2): 111-122 doi: 10.1023/A:1021838618750
    Singer D A, Menzie W D, Sutphin D, Mosier D L, BlissJ D, 2001. Mineral Deposit Density-An Update. In: Schulz K, ed. Methods in Global Mineral Resource Assessment, Chapter A. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1640, 39 (in Press)
    Wilford J, 2000. Thematic Mapping and Three Dimensional Modeling of the Regolith for Mineral and Environmental Assessment. Abstracts CD, 31st International Geologic Congress, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(1087) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return